121

We've all heard the liberal argument "if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you're morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler." But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kristina@hexbear.net 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What policies would make someone 1% worse than Hitler? Advocates for smoking cigarettes on top of being hitler?

[-] Eris235@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago

~~He's mean and orange and says cringe things on twitter~~

Realistically, being healthier and more competent would have made Hitler worse I guess

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
822 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS