497
AI is creating fake historical photos, and that's a problem
(marinaamaral.substack.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
497 points (93.8% liked)
Technology
59454 readers
1674 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
what's wrong with simple cryptographic signatures?
why do I need a block chain?
That could be also. But how do you confirm the legitimation of the file? I'm asking because I'm not sure if there is an easy way, like a HASH checking and something that can support it for validation.
From a logistical perspective, an arbitrary and every increasing number of documents tied to a single blockchain sounds like it'll create a chain that is unfathomably hard to work with. It'll eat up all the hard drive space you'll have available.
do you trust the person who signed it? if not, dont fucking trust it.
what more needs to be done?