738
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Let me guess, the stem cells are harvested from pigs?

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 6 months ago

Presumably they culture more, but obviously the first cells would have had to. Some of these companies have been very particular about sourcing their starting cells non-lethally from sanctuary animals or whatever, because why not.

[-] Zerthax@reddthat.com 9 points 6 months ago

If you only have to do it once (or a few times) and can use it repeatedly ad infinitum, you can be just about as discerning as you want.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago
[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 10 points 6 months ago

Generally stem cell cultures these days are sourced once then replicated forever.

[-] emmanuel_car@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

That’s pretty incredible, with no noticeable degradation between replications? I know very little about stem cell cultures.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

There’d have to be some degradation over time. Unless they’re repairing the DNA using computerized backups or something.

[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

The stem cells themselves are self-repairing and self replicating. Quoting Wikipedia:

Due to the self-renewal capacity of stem cells, a stem cell line can be cultured in vitro indefinitely.

Currently all embryonic stem cell research and therapies in the US are conducted using only 486 cultures.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago

Likely, but stem cell harvesting is not as horrible for pigs and doesn't require thousands of them either. It's certainly a massive improvement.

[-] kamenlady@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

That's kinda the point‽

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
738 points (98.4% liked)

Futurology

1670 readers
129 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS