354
submitted 8 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

And the IEA, for its part, expects China to continue to be the sole meaningful over-achiever. It recently revised upwards by 728 GW its forecast for total global renewables capacity additions in the period 2023–27. China’s share of this upward revision? Almost 90 percent. While China surges ahead, the rest of the world remains stuck.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

I mean, does it count to be 'stuck' if you simply aren't trying?

Because that's what it seems like the rest of the world is doing. They aren't even trying. Not even a little. Just more technocratic discussions on what trying might look like.

[-] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"Trying" isn't really a thing on a national scale. What countries do and how they react just depends on their economic system / mode of production.

Capitalist countries, on account of being capitalist, can never really tackle climate change. China's the only major country taking this seriously because a socialist nation doesn't need the profit motive that's required under capitalism.

As with most things, the answer is revolution.

[-] P1r4nha@feddit.de 6 points 7 months ago

Let's not call China socialist when a single party dictates larger economic trends in an otherwise competitive global market. It's just not "free" as in free market capitalism.

Otherwise I completely agree with the weaknesses of the western capitalist systems.

[-] Pascal@lemdro.id 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

a single party dictates larger economic trends

You're describing socialism.

Well, so long as that party directs it in the interests of the people rather than capitalists, as is the case for China.

[-] P1r4nha@feddit.de 0 points 7 months ago

Really? I'm not convinced the Chinese government acts in the interests of its people at all. That's probably the biggest reason I can't call it Socialism. Just because government influence is stronger than in the West, the economic system isn't completely different.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
354 points (95.2% liked)

World News

32315 readers
1006 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS