205
submitted 2 years ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Walt Disney Co on Friday said that remarks by activist investor Nelson Peltz criticizing the company for making movies dominated by female and Black actors is evidence that he shouldn't be on Disney's board.

Peltz, whose fight to join Disney as a director has become one of the year's most bitter and closely watched board battles, in an interview with the Financial Times said Disney's films have become too focused on delivering a message, and not enough on quality storytelling. He specifically took issue with "The Marvels" and "Black Panther."

“Why do I have to have a Marvel that’s all women? Not that I have anything against women, but why do I have to do that?" Peltz said in the interview, published on Friday. "Why can’t I have Marvels that are both? Why do I need an all-Black cast?”

Asked about Peltz's remarks, a Disney spokesperson responded: "This is exactly why Nelson Peltz shouldn't be anywhere near a creatively driven company."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What all black cast is he talking about? And yes the marvels was all women but... They didn't even fucking gender swap the characters like Ghostbusters or something like that?

And out of all the fucking MCU it's the only movie with three female leads.

Edit- Jesus Christ I'm an idiot. It hit me. He's bitching that Black panther was about black people isn't he??

[-] skeezix@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

He’s also upset that the black panther wore a black suit.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br -4 points 2 years ago

Ghostbusters gender swapped the characters? AFAIK, is just a new team of ghostbusters that happens to be all women.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

It was a reboot except women this time. So yeah... Gender swapping. Not trying to start all that drama btw... I honestly like the movie. I own it even. It didn't have shit on the originals that's for damn sure but... It wasn't the horror the internet made it out to be.

[-] Xrfauxtard@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Was that Ghostbusters really decent? I have the avoided all the new Ghostbusters, not because of the internet outrage crap, but because Ghostbusters 2 was an absolute steaming pile of dog shit. I figured the new reboots / whatever were going to be even worse than that atrocity.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Eh....if you didn't like 2 then you probably wont like these either. Personally I like them all. Girl ghostbusters was absolutely the weakest for me but still dumb fun. Honestly did something i would have KILLED to see explored in a sequel. The feds showing up and basically being like 'yes we know god damn well there are ghosts now will you shut the fuck up about it?' Afterlife was god damn good to me. Something at the end was pretty controversial for some but absolutely fucking destroyed me.

But like I said..I know some people hated 2 and...yeah. if you are one then the new ones probably wont be your thing either.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It was a good movie. Not great, but good enough to enjoy it without a single eye-roll..

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

In my opinion, there's already a great Ghostbusters movie. I don't need to see any more. I'd rather them do something new than drag that (or any other) IP around for easy money.

this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
205 points (95.2% liked)

News

36384 readers
801 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS