386
submitted 7 months ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world -5 points 7 months ago

Imagine spending your time, money, and resource on fancy thought chips instead of actually working to cure the disease bcz you think a brain chip is worth more money.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 7 points 7 months ago

...working on the "thought chips" are working on a cure. Or a workaround for the handicap, at least.

Would you accuse the guy who invented the wheelchair of wasting their time on a fancy mobile lay-z-boy instead of "working on a cure"?

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, I just know how people like Elon Musk think. He thought this was a better investment than research to cure this. I mean, if you haven't figured it out yet, which it seems like you haven't, they are using this guy as a PR stunt for the product.

There was no intention or aim of improving the life of quadriplegic people with this.

It's purely a means to an end for Elon Musk. And quiet frankly, people should be scared shitless of having these things inside their head.

But, it's a feel good story, so people don't see the wider implications of the device.

[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

What are your opinions on cochlear implants?

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Irrelevant, cochlear implants don't require them to crack open your skull in a major surgery that can kill you.

[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So you would be fine with them "spending the money on developing fancy thought chips instead of a cure" if the implant had similar complications/survivability rates as cochlear implants?

And cochlear surgery, while quite safe, isn't exactly the most minor surgery. They're going pretty deep into your head to put that stimulator gizmo on your auditory nerve behind your inner ear.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

No, this technology is bad news. Have billionaires and governments ever shown themselves to behave ethically and in the best interest of anybody but themselves ever?

This is basically the internet of things, except inside your head. The security implications alone should be enough to not want this.

But, that's my bad, it's on me for thinking people are on average smart enough to see a problem before it becomes one. It's been too long since the pandemic, I'm starting to forget how stupid the population actually is.

[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Look man, you seem to be buying into the boogy-man of people just getting these implanted on a whim. That's not the use case, and probably won't be in the next 50-100yrs.

This is a technology specifically for people with hugely debilitating conditions. People who can't move or talk, and have to communicate with eye movements.

You can talk all you want about how dangerous this technology is, and you're right. It potentially could be. You know what else that's true for? Pacemakers. Pacemakers are hugely invasive to put in, and have proven vulnerable to Bluetooth attacks over and over and over again. It's trivially easy to hack someones pacemaker and potentially kill them. It's an IoT device implant through and through. And you know what no one is advocating against having? Pacemakers. Because without them people would just die instead.

This is the same thing. Are there dangers? Absolutely. You know who doesn't care? The person who literally takes 20min to type out "Hello" on an eye tracker keyboard. This tech is game changing for them. It gives them the ability to interact with the world far beyond any other measure we have today. And I don't think it takes much empathy to realize that maybe that makes it worth investing in.

this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
386 points (93.9% liked)

News

23305 readers
3527 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS