1483
rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

FAQ

Q: why not organize and stop treating the bus as a legitimate entity? why aren’t you working to stop the bus?

A: do both. cut the fuel line. break windows. put oatmeal in the gas tank. but maybe your efforts don’t succeed this election cycle. and if so don’t fucking throw away your vote if it can help your neighbors fucking survive. “harm reduction” is not a political strategy for action. it is a last minute, end of the line decision to save lives, after all other resources have been exhausted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

And because of how FPTP works, they unfortunately translate to “Trump”, “Biden”, “Whatever” and “I don’t care”.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 2 points 7 months ago

this is straight up election misinformation. a vote for any candidate may only be voted for that candidate, and it can't be discarded.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So you think Kennedy or the other candidates are likely to get more votes than Trump and Biden?

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 2 points 7 months ago

no, but that's not what i said, either.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

…and you think in a FPTP system voting for someone who is very unlikely to win isn’t effectively the same as voting “whatever”? What’s the difference?

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 2 points 7 months ago

the difference is that voting "whatever" is the same as not voting. by contrast, voting for a candidate is voting... for that candidate.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So the difference is for one you have to waste your time to achieve the same result?

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

it's not the same result. in one scenario, the vote total doesn't change. in the other, a candidate gets one more vote.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So you don’t care who wins but want to increase voter turnout?

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

of course i care who wins. i want my candidate to win. that's why i vote for them.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

And you already admitted it’s unlikely that’s going to happen.

I’d also like to become a millionaire, but that doesn’t mean spending all my money on slot machines makes sense.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

it's the right thing to do. ends don't justify means.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You’re just letting perfect be the enemy of good. And while unfortunately “good” is not really that good, the alternative is way too dangerous to risk it over moral principles. It’s sad, but as long as FPTP stays in place the only correct choice is to vote for the “least bad” of the main two.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

voting for bad people is bad. it's not that I'm letting perfect be the enemy of the good. im letting good be the enemy of bad.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I mean, do whatever you want, it’s clear you’re not going to change your mind. Just keep in mind that if Trump wins, you also contributed to that.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 7 months ago

no, i didn't. biden won in 2020 and i voted for howie. am i allowed to take credit for that? it makes no sense.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You contributed to that by not voting for Trump, yes. That’s FPTP.

It absolutely makes no sense but it’s the system in place and there’s pretty much nothing people can do about it short of overthrowing the government.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You're not getting it, it doesn't matter who wins the next election because Trump and Biden are so very similar. So many of the things people are saying Trump will do is already happening under the Biden administration. If the Democrats saw that they lost the election bc 10-20% of voters issued a protest or third party vote, which actually happened during the primaries, it would make a huge impact.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So many of the things people are saying Trump will do is already happening under the Biden administration.

…because of officials elected by Trump.

There’s a crapload of policies others already pointed out that make Biden extremely different from Trump, if you still think they’re “very similar” you’re just being willfully ignorant at this point.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Biden is definitely more palatable, but at the end of the day, either way we will have a president happy to fund genocide. Either way we waste billions on military, have a huge incarcerated prison population, deport immigrants, could go on. Biden was vice president during Obama's drone strikes.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

That’s undeniably true. But to say they’re very similar is a huge exaggeration.

It’s the difference between drinking expired milk with or without cyanide inside. You’re still getting food poisoning but one is most definitely worse.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

It's more like drinking expired milk and both have different quantities of cyanide, and both milks are funding genocide. You're dying either way. Strategic action could shift things, blindly voting for Democrats no matter what they do gives them no incentive to change their behavior.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

No matter how much you want to make Biden look bad, the end results are not the same (unless you live in Gaza, but even then I highly doubt strategic actions matter unless you mean straight-up overthrowing the government).

this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
1483 points (100.0% liked)

196

16490 readers
3321 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS