177

you know the one

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AnarchoTankie@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago

my opinion: Civ4 is all around a better game. Most details are just better in Ci4. Except, Civ5's one-unit-per-tile + hex-tiles are superior to Civ4's stacks-of-doom. It boils down to what's important to you, tile based tactics, or the rest of the game.

[-] LeylaLove@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago

Addendum question: what if I'm absolute ass at strategy games? I cannot understand enough of Civ to have any strategy nailed down, and that's why I enjoy it. Is Civ 4 better or at least equal on this front? Do I need a bunch of old game knowledge to make this fun? For reference, I'm okay with being steamrolled by AI, as long as I don't need to do any googling to get past it

[-] AnarchoTankie@hexbear.net 1 points 7 months ago

ok so there is grand strategy and tactics. Both probably the same in grand strategy, civ5 probably requires more thinking the tactics department. in civ4 you just make sure your stack of doom is bigger (more units in single tile).

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
177 points (100.0% liked)

games

20540 readers
356 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS