464
submitted 7 months ago by fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com to c/games@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kir@feddit.it 162 points 7 months ago

I hate this so much. Why should they be able to do this?

One thing is stopping customer support and internal software/OS development. But why should they BLOCK compatibility for third party developers?

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 105 points 7 months ago

I guess because fuck you, they got their money 🤷 It really should be illegal.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby 77 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Tech company, they love E-Waste. Your thing can still play fine? Fuck you, buy our new shit that have all those advanced privacy invasive tracker loaded into it, and let us snoop around so we can share your info with other tech company.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

I still can't fathom people are somehow okay with buying a device that is, by design and function, festooned with cameras and microphones from goddamn Facebook and waving it around inside their homes. Like, what?

[-] ji59@kbin.social 34 points 7 months ago

I bought Oculus Quest 1. OCULUS! Facebook promised to leave them alone, for them to remain oculus, But after a year or so, merging started, firstly with oculus accounts vanishing into fb, then renaming to Meta Quest and now the only thing that remain is logo.

[-] yoyolll@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

What exactly is a promise from Facebook worth? You saw what happened to Palmer Luckey (although he is wiping those tears with crisp hundred dollar bills).

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Nothing, since they've already lied about the ongoing account integration requirements for their various VR products, like, three (?) major times so far. I don't trust a damn thing they say about anything.

If Meta told me the sky was blue I'd be searching for independent verification.

[-] ThunderingJerboa@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Vr is very price prohibitive and Oculus/Facebook sell headsets at a loss to make their marketshare. Its not great but if you want to "try vr" especially something you hear will make you physically sick to use and you might not even like. Its just logical to spend the least amount of money on it for a "proper headset". Like if you value your privacy that is fine and completely understandable but lets be honest here, most people don't. Especially with the popularization of social media and smart phones like we can even apply the same logic with your argument with phones like why would you buy a device that has so many cameras and microphones and wave it around your home and toilet. Hell I think the phone is actually worse since most people bring them everywhere while a headset is a bit more constrained on where you can take it.

[-] Kir@feddit.it 2 points 7 months ago

But they make their new products with 10% of recycled plastics and a cardboard box! SO ECO-FRIENDLY!

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 17 points 7 months ago

By killing the product completely they're forcing their users to upgrade. It's always profits man, that's always the reason

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago

It's called "planned obsolescence".

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 7 months ago

Not even planned obsolescence... It's just "hey, you guys aren't buying our slightly better new version. We were talking today about how to make a little bit more money, and we decided, hey, we don't want to maintain this anymore. We also don't want to unlock it and let someone else take over, and while we're at it let's just start shutting off features until you buy a new one. Because fuck you"

[-] Kir@feddit.it 1 points 7 months ago

I know. I was saying that is so unreasonable that they shouldn't be allowed to do it.

That said. I hope people are not so stupid to trust Meta with an upgrade after something like that.

[-] Gigasser@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Better to have invested in a Valve Index I feel than get an Oculus. Might be more expensive, but I trust Valve to not completely fuck over their consumers.

[-] 50MYT@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Minor exception is Australia.

Valve hates Australia (valve lost in court over refunds here).

So we don't get access to their hardware directly. It's lame.

[-] Gigasser@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I don't get why you're being downvoted, sounds like a localization/price/law thing, like Brazil and the price of consoles and games over there.

[-] 50MYT@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

It's lemmy.

I'm used to it. If you post something that's not with the hive mind, you get down voted, regardless of you are correct.

[-] ThunderingJerboa@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

I mean not really. Again the index is a great headset but look at how long people actually use their headsets for. Is it better to throw your money into a pit that is $400 or $1000. VR is a weird since you either love it or hate it. Most people are going to hate it and many people aren't really into the idea of reselling their stuff. This isn't to say facebook good or some nonsense like that but from a prospective customer's standpoint why spend so much money on something you might not even like. You don't have to drill any holes in your walls to put up base stations while inside out tracking isn't great it gets the job done and again its far more convenient. I like the option to have base stations but again realistically putting in so much work for something you might only spend a week or month on is not a great investment of your money or time. If you like VR, I would highly suggest getting a better headset than a quest or oculus headset but a newcomer I will 100% suggest a quest over anything else especially a used model to save them extra cash.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Why should they be able to do this?

Because we own nothing now.

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
464 points (98.1% liked)

Games

32584 readers
902 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS