794
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Malgas@beehaw.org 21 points 7 months ago

That math assumes a flat distribution of popping times, which I suspect is incorrect.

Listening to a bag of microwave popcorn, it starts off slow, gets more rapid, and then tapers off again, implying that kernels are more likely to pop near the average time, which makes it somewhat more likely for two kernels to pop simultaneously.

But yeah, whole bag at once is probably still basically zero. Unless you use one of these, of course.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago

Agreed! I admit I made a few sweeping simplifications to shoehorn this into a discrete math problem.

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 1 points 7 months ago

Assume a frictionless spherical microwave.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 7 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

one of these

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 7 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

one of these

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
794 points (100.0% liked)

196

16509 readers
2331 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS