834
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Liquid assets are a type of wealth. For many people, liquid assets make up the biggest part of their wealth.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

No, they don't. Liquid assets don't increase in value. If they had $1 in cash seven years ago, it would be worth less than that today due to inflation.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Stocks are liquid assets. They can increase in value.

T-bills are also liquid assets. They can also increase in value.

Savings accounts and money market accounts are also liquid assets. They can also increase in value.

[-] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 months ago

I'm pretty sure that liquid assets are things that you can spend, so cash and bank accounts. Anything that you have to sell to buy things is not a liquid asset. (Note that we are not talking about barter. I had a friend at college who traded a snake for a VW camper, neither of which would be considered a liquid asset. Even though technically you could put the snake in a giant blender...)

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No, a liquid asset is one that can be sold quickly for its full market value.

For example, if you have stocks worth $100K, you can quickly convert them to $100K in cash. Whereas real estate is not liquid, because you usually cannot quickly convert a house worth $100K into cash.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Some people make a distinction between "liquid assets" and "near-liquid assets" and would classify something like a money market account (which also does grow in value as many liquid assets do) as a liquid asset, and maybe some forms of stock as near-liquid assets...but I'm splitting hairs.

Ultimately, you're right...downvotes be damned.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago

When you're a billionaire, most of your net worth comes from businesses you own, not liquid assets.

[-] SpacePirate@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

And guess what those business have? Valuations. Stock price is just an aggregate indicator of the valuation for a company, for the given percentage of shares that are publicly traded. But private companies have valuations, too, and even if they’re not tied to a public stock offering, those valuations are used to form these Billionaire lists.

Same thing with real estate. The value of any asset is based on what someone is willing to pay. Sometimes, you’ll find some crazy billionaire or investment firm who grossly overvalues an asset relative to their peers, and that insane overvaluation does get rolled into those lists.

But such is the nature of economics. You’ve neither gained nor lost value until someone pays you. Until then, it’s anyone’s guess.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Billionaires are far more likely to own part of a business than 100% of a business. And if you own stocks, then you too own part of a business.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

When you’re a billionaire, most of your net worth comes from ~~businesses~~ assets you own (and can borrow against without having to claim the loans as income), not liquid assets.

FTFY

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
834 points (98.5% liked)

News

23182 readers
2965 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS