410
submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

I've lived in the US for quite a few decades, but I'm still a German citizen. When asked why I don't take US citizenship, I give a three-part answer:

  1. I don't believe you can owe allegiance to two different entities at the same time.
  2. Between a German EU passport and a US Green Card, I can travel almost anywhere in the world.
  3. I f I ever run into legal troubles, first call is to the wife, second goes to the embassy.
[-] donio@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

This is a personal decision but I think it's better to be pragmatic about it. If your country of origin permits dual citizenship I'd do the naturalization simply because it gives you more flexibility. It's a more secure status, no need to worry about renewing or spending longer periods abroad. And you get to vote of course.

Citizenships and passports are bureaucracy and they don't define who you are, that comes from your heart. I'd look at it as a practical matter.

My understanding is that Germany is looking to start permitting dual citizenship later this year.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Citizenships and passports are bureaucracy and they don’t define who you are, that comes from your heart. I’d look at it as a practical matter.

You sound like my wife before I gave in and we got a marriage license. I don't need a fucking shaman or some civil servant in a black weird dress to legitimize our relationship.

[-] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

I felt/feel the same way. Still got married to my wife for legal reasons. Her mother is insane and if something happened to my wife, we don't want her getting power of attorney, nor do we even want her in the hospital if it can be avoided.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago

They're not legitimizing your relationship, they're granting accesss to legal rights.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

They are saying you get X rights if you have Y status. Where Y is your legally recognized relationship with a person.

It is understood that if my wife can't make a medical decision and one has to be made I can repeat what her wishes would have been. Why is that? Because we are married? Why does being married matter? Because it is a relationship? Why does that differ from any other relationship? Because it is a legitimate one.

This whole process is the government or some religion saying this relationship between two people is a special exception from the rules governing regular relationships.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago

Other relationships are legitimate, they just aren't legally recognized by the government. You can make a contract that gives anyone rights to medical decision-making.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Cool. So there was never once in history laws that regulated say unmarried people living together? Remind me what was going on in Loving v. Virginia.

How about immigration? Do you think you are going to sponsor a person you aren't legally married with just because you two are in love?

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 7 months ago

You say cool but you don't seem chill to me

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

That’s fair, I did however need some shaman to give my wife healthcare. Thankfully anyone can be one these days

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Can I ask why you live in the US when you could live in Europe?

[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

It's a long story for another time.

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Ok no worries. I just can't help but be curious about someone living there when they don't have to.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

It's Friday. We've got time to kill.

[-] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Just so you know, you may get fucked financially if your wife dies (or vice versa). I would look into it.

[-] Breve@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago

Another thing to consider is that US citizens must pay taxes on all foreign income and investments even if they leave to live outside the US. This is why the US has made renouncing US citizenship expensive and complicated, like even after you renounce it you still have to pay US taxes for 10 more years despite losing the rest of your citizenship privileges immediately.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 4 points 7 months ago

FYI the citizenship law is changing later this month, you’ll be able to acquire US citizenship without losing your German one. https://www.rtpartner.de/immigration/doppelte-staatsbuergerschaft/

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Is that a personal belief, or a legal one? Because the US does recognize dual citizenship. Germany does too, in certain conditions.

[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Citizenship is one thing, but allegiance is another.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

So if you believe they're separate, I don't see how believing you can only have one allegiance affects your citizenship(s).

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
410 points (97.9% liked)

News

23275 readers
1340 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS