410
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

I've lived in the US for quite a few decades, but I'm still a German citizen. When asked why I don't take US citizenship, I give a three-part answer:

  1. I don't believe you can owe allegiance to two different entities at the same time.
  2. Between a German EU passport and a US Green Card, I can travel almost anywhere in the world.
  3. I f I ever run into legal troubles, first call is to the wife, second goes to the embassy.
[-] donio@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

This is a personal decision but I think it's better to be pragmatic about it. If your country of origin permits dual citizenship I'd do the naturalization simply because it gives you more flexibility. It's a more secure status, no need to worry about renewing or spending longer periods abroad. And you get to vote of course.

Citizenships and passports are bureaucracy and they don't define who you are, that comes from your heart. I'd look at it as a practical matter.

My understanding is that Germany is looking to start permitting dual citizenship later this year.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Citizenships and passports are bureaucracy and they don’t define who you are, that comes from your heart. I’d look at it as a practical matter.

You sound like my wife before I gave in and we got a marriage license. I don't need a fucking shaman or some civil servant in a black weird dress to legitimize our relationship.

[-] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I felt/feel the same way. Still got married to my wife for legal reasons. Her mother is insane and if something happened to my wife, we don't want her getting power of attorney, nor do we even want her in the hospital if it can be avoided.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That’s fair, I did however need some shaman to give my wife healthcare. Thankfully anyone can be one these days

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

They're not legitimizing your relationship, they're granting accesss to legal rights.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

They are saying you get X rights if you have Y status. Where Y is your legally recognized relationship with a person.

It is understood that if my wife can't make a medical decision and one has to be made I can repeat what her wishes would have been. Why is that? Because we are married? Why does being married matter? Because it is a relationship? Why does that differ from any other relationship? Because it is a legitimate one.

This whole process is the government or some religion saying this relationship between two people is a special exception from the rules governing regular relationships.

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Other relationships are legitimate, they just aren't legally recognized by the government. You can make a contract that gives anyone rights to medical decision-making.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Cool. So there was never once in history laws that regulated say unmarried people living together? Remind me what was going on in Loving v. Virginia.

How about immigration? Do you think you are going to sponsor a person you aren't legally married with just because you two are in love?

[-] whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago

You say cool but you don't seem chill to me

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Can I ask why you live in the US when you could live in Europe?

[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It's a long story for another time.

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Ok no worries. I just can't help but be curious about someone living there when they don't have to.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's Friday. We've got time to kill.

[-] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Just so you know, you may get fucked financially if your wife dies (or vice versa). I would look into it.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 4 points 2 years ago

FYI the citizenship law is changing later this month, you’ll be able to acquire US citizenship without losing your German one. https://www.rtpartner.de/immigration/doppelte-staatsbuergerschaft/

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Is that a personal belief, or a legal one? Because the US does recognize dual citizenship. Germany does too, in certain conditions.

[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Citizenship is one thing, but allegiance is another.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

So if you believe they're separate, I don't see how believing you can only have one allegiance affects your citizenship(s).

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
410 points (97.9% liked)

News

36011 readers
917 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS