191
submitted 2 years ago by bdonvr@thelemmy.club to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 46 points 2 years ago

packwatch I'm not going to shed any tears if she's executed but I also kinda hope it gets downgraded to a life sentence.

[-] booty@hexbear.net 51 points 2 years ago

I'm against killing prisoners but I'm 100% for keeping the death penalty on the books just so you can sentence all billionaires to death before graciously lessening their sentence

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

I am a little (emphasis on little) surprised how many people on here and on the X seem ok with this.

[-] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago

Did you think it was all a bit and we didn’t actually want the billionaires to die?

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

I thought there was a little more pushback on the death penalty. I don't doubt that people want to see the end of billionaires.

[-] Thordros@hexbear.net 26 points 2 years ago

The death penalty is bad when wielded by bad people for bad reasons, and good when wielded by good people for good reasons. Materialism ain't that complicated, Dakota.

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

Disagre, there's no such thing as a good death penalty presided over by good people, it's too risky, too high a chance for a mistake even in the best system

Unless it's a billionaire, then there can't be a mistake

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

My personal belief is that it is always bad.

[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago

My personal favorite Che quotation

Executions? Yes, we have executed. We execute and we will continue to execute when it is necessary. Our fight is a fight to the death.

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

Well Che was leading an armed revolution. This is a trial in an established state.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So there are situations in which it’s not bad, but necessary?

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Any action that results in taking a life is a tragedy. That it is necessary for people to be killed during a war in order to prevent the slaughter of innocent people is ludicrously stupid in an age where there are enough resources to support the world's population. Executions during an ongoing revolution fall into a gray area that may qualify as self defense, as letting the person live may result in the deaths of more people.

[-] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

Letting any billionaire live inevitably results in more death and misery. When does the state of war/revolution end?

[-] OneDakotaPolicy@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

So if a billionaire is stripped of and isolated from their resources, and sent to be re-educated, they will still lead to more death and misery? There is no possible path to becoming a functioning member of society?

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Generally agree when it’s in peace time. But defrauding workers like this? Very few countries in this world ever punish these people, and even in the socialist ones, the rich enjoy immense privilege. The death penalty may not deter an average guy from committing heinous crimes because he has no expectation of decency from his society. But it does put the fear of god into the people who think they’re untouchable. Now, for Vietnam to weed out its corruption from the top so shit like this needs to happen less.

[-] Owl@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago

It's not ideal, but it would take a great deal of effort to restrain a billionaire's influence (merely stripping their assets and imprisoning them isn't enough), and while I would prefer a society that spends that great deal of effort to save people, there are still homeless and starving people whose lives could be saved with less effort.

[-] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago

billionaires are kinda like monarchists, they could "abdicate" and peacefully live out the rest of their life as a dirt farmer or work in a factory they used to own but most of them would rather die than be a normal person.

[-] yoink@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

imo it is a minor form of liberalism to believe that there exists any amount of punishment and recuperative effort that would meaningfully remove the very power and influence that got said billionaire to this point in the first place

[-] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

No half measures, Walter

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm against the death penalty because the person thus penalized may not be guilty, and could be rehabilitate. Post revolution I'd say the death penalty should flat out not exist, but for now, there's no way to be wrong about billionaires

They either are or are not billionaires. And if they ARE, they get it in the neck

[-] xkyfal18@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 2 years ago

Gotta love it when capitalist pigs get what they deserve

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago

I’m generally not okay with the death sentence. But I’m also not going to lose sleep over this one. If you dropped dead tomorrow in their factories they won’t even be notified about it. You’ll be replaced before they finish their caviar. Hopefully she’ll be dead before I finish pissing.

[-] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

Do you understand what these greedy psychopath type of people do to our society?

Death is too good for them.

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
191 points (100.0% liked)

news

24512 readers
389 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS