282
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
282 points (94.6% liked)
Ask Lemmy
27043 readers
418 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Mine is music. And the common occurrence is the myths. Just sooooo many myths, from tonewoods, to signal chains, to techniques.. if you're into recording in any way typically you have the tools actually in-hand to test these myths and 99% dont. They then get rather angry at those that have and adjusted their outlook.
What you mean I dont need a $400 XLR that has
Those big fancy words sound super important. It's even got special features such as a disconnected ground
God this is so bad, I don't even want to link it, but here you go Did I mentioned the Hard-Cell Foam (HCF) Insulation?
note
Click just the h for the actual link. Good luck :pI LOVE a good rickroll! 🤣
I have van damme cables that cost me a fortune back in the day, still going strong but nowhere near 400 notes
Glad you enjoyed it.
The Van Damme cables seem less of a scam to me. Instead of specifications from fantacy land, they seem to have put some effort into actully making a better cable.
If nothing else, however rediculous "silver plated oxygen free copper" sounds to me for an audio cable, it is a lot better than "carban based noise dissapation layer".
I am curious, in what situation would you decide to buy something like a Van Damme over a regular name brand well made cable.
Basically two things at the time. One was the solder on the jack kept coming off on the cheaper cables at the time, so I'd lose signal. The second is I'm a clumsy git and would sometimes snag a cable popping it free from the device it was connected to. Keep tredding on cables and they dont like it, but the van dammes took it waay better.
I took an audio focused CS course in university and for my main project, I evaluated, among other things, the sound quality of various cables and a distortion pedal I had. None of the cables made a noticeable difference, same thing with the pass through mode on the pedal. I didn't set up a crazy long daisy chain to find out if they eventually did make a difference, but I bet even then it wouldn't be a big deal.
And for digital, it's even less so because you need a lot of error before you start mixing up 0s and 1s.
I've, in my own limited ability, looked at 50m of guitar cable verses 3 and seen a drop off in higher frequencies. Basically lost the "sparkle". Might depend on the cable and other factors though. You put a sine sweep through the signal chain to test it
It's been a while so I don't remember the specifics exactly, but I believe I used a square wave because it's easier to see frequency dropoff. The more that gets dropped (at least at the high end), the rounder looking a wave you'll end up seeing.
Now I'm wondering what happens if I use a square sweep to generate an IR on a guitar cab.... 🤔
I don't know if it needs to be a sweep, even. A square wave technically includes all frequencies to create that instant rise and hold because a freq high enough to rise that fast will also drop immediately after so a slightly lower frequency is needed to cancel that out, which then needs a lower one to cancel it out and so on. So you can see right away just by looking how well the square shape is maintained if all of the frequencies are making it through. If the corners look more rounded, then high frequencies are being lost. If the flat part looks bulgy, low frequencies are being lost. If the flat part looks squiggly, mid-range frequencies are being lost.
Though it is more of a rough brute force approach and a sin wave sweep will give a better idea of specific frequency response.
And I should correct what I said earlier, it wasn't that none of the cables were dropping anything, but that they all looked similar in what they were dropping and there wasn't much of a difference between a 10cm patch cable, a $2 3m cable, or a $30 3m cable.
If I ever get the space to set it up I might try it all out. I managed to get an IR out of the noise someone's guitar pedal made on a record.
Jim Lill sees your comment and he frickn LOVES it!
Only discovered him last year. I know Fricker was more open to these tests, though he can grate I know.