2
submitted 1 year ago by GreenCrush@lemmy.world to c/zelda@lemmy.ml

I'm not going to deny that they are good games, they definitely are. However, there are some design choices made with BOTW and TOTK that really make me separate them from the rest of the series.

The item degradation, the voice acting, the open worldness, all these things aren't what I want from a Zelda, and because of that, I doubt I'll ever replay those games again. Again, not bad games at all, and if anyone said they were their favorite games, I'd totally understand that.

But does anyone else wish that we would get a more traditional Zelda game again?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WolfLink@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Idk about that. OoT was a 3D adaptation of the 2D Zelda formula. The fundamental Zelda formula has changed very little since A Link to the Past.

My idea of the “Zelda Formula” is a structured metroidvania where each “dungeon” is basically a mini metroidvania centered around one item, and the path between dungeons is usually more story driven. Occasionally there are items and puzzles between dungeons as well.

IMO the only Zelda games that don’t really follow the formula are:

  • The Legend of Zelda (follows it loosely)
  • Zelda II (follows it very loosely)
  • A Link Between Worlds (kinda follows it but discards key aspects of it)
  • The multiplayer entries (Four Swords, Four Swords Adventures, Triforce Heros) (kinda follow it but discard key aspects of it)
  • Breath of the Wild
  • Tears of the Kingdom (follows it very loosely)
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
2 points (75.0% liked)

The Legend of Zelda

3671 readers
1 users here now

A community for everything related to The Legend of Zelda franchise!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS