129
UK Prime Minister to create ‘smokefree generation’ by ending cigarette sales to those born on or after 1 January 2009 (www.gov.uk)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by activistPnk@slrpnk.net to c/anticonsumption@slrpnk.net
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I think it was the prime minister (or spokesperson) who made this very clever argument: (paraphrasing) “we are not taking away choice… cigarettes are designed to inherently take away your choice by trapping you in an addiction.”

I’m not picking sides here, just pointing out a great piece of rhetoric to spin the policy as taking away something that takes away your choice. Effectively putting forward the idea that you don’t have choice to begin with.

(sorry to say this rhetoric was not mentioned in the linked article; I just heard it on BBC World Service)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] radiant_bloom@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

I disagree about the health stuff, but I’m French, so I’ve always taken is as a given that we pay (almost) every healthcare expense through taxes. If you ask me, that’s just the cost of freedom 🤷🏻‍♀️

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee -2 points 6 months ago

I agree healthcare should be a shared expense except in cases where a person knowingly does this much damage to their body. Not a hill I'd die on, but it seems more fair.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

Don't cover anyone who drinks beer, eats fast food, etc etc then.

Surely that will be good for society.

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago

If someone is alcoholic or eats until their health is seriously compromised they could cover related medical expenses with private insurance.

No need to downvote and get sarcastic just because you disagree.

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
129 points (97.1% liked)

Anticonsumption

317 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sibbo@sopuli.xyz