583
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

It lets the host have somebody they are clearly "smarter" than to gain the trust of the audience. It doesn't even serve the purpose of the audience insert like in a movie, because explaining things doesn't require that if you aren't trying to get immersed in the rules of a fictional world.

Carl Sagan didn't need someone to pretend to be a fool to explain things.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Carl Sagan didn't need someone to pretend to be a fool to explain things.

That he did not. But I imagine it would take more of a predisposition to the subject to view Carl's stuff, than Neil. Neil is taking the science to everyone. And in order to do that, you have to have a bit of arrogance (look at why Trump is so popular) and a bit of pizzazz. It's gotta cater to a lot more people.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

Sagan took the science to everyone just fine.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Okay. Btw did you down vote my comment as you made this comment? Just curious.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

Your statement:

Neil is taking the science to everyone. And in order to do that, you have to have a bit of arrogance (look at why Trump is so popular) and a bit of pizzazz.

Doesn't contribute to the conversation becsuse we were just talking about Sagan who did not need to be arrogant to bring science to everyone. Nor did you need to bring Trump into this thread when he has no relevance in any way to the conversation.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Well holy shit, excuse me for being tangential. I shall excuse myself from this narrow conversation to which you may bring no simile. I don't wish to communicate with you again due to fear of breaching the subject. Thank you.

๐Ÿ™„

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

Don't ask questions if you don't want to hear the answer.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

I wanted to hear the answer, don't worry.

What I'm saying, in case you don't speak sarcasm, is that the statement I made touches on the subject tangentially, and is not completely off-topic. You are being extremely petty and it's incredibly unbecoming.

Please don't talk to me anymore, thank you for respecting my wishes.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It was one downvote, get over youreelf.

There's a block feature if you don't want someeone to respond to you.

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
583 points (95.6% liked)

The Onion

4254 readers
357 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS