68
submitted 6 months ago by intelshill@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Woht24@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He didn't die, he got stabbed with a pen. If you're going to explain the context, at least know it.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-16/who-is-bishop-mar-mari-emmanuel-wakeley-church-attack/103728808

[-] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 4 points 6 months ago

I haven't seen any source suggesting it was a pen. Several sources, such as https://www.aap.com.au/news/police-powers-bolstered-as-terror-attack-probe-widens/, describe the weapon as a "flick-knife". Other sources say that the bishop victim was "seriously injured", and the assailant was injured in the attack and his own finger was sliced off with the knife.

I think you are right that no one died, but wrong that the weapon was a pen - this was a serious attack with an actual knife.

[-] Woht24@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Interesting, not what was initially reported. I definitely read it was a pen originally but I believe it was an early article that has since been edited by the ABC.

There's nothing that really reports what the weapon is that I can find just verbs of 'stabbed' and 'knifed'.

[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu 4 points 6 months ago

Even if it was a pen he got stabbed with it and he only lived due to the intervention of skilled surgeons.

He was being stabbed to death by the guy. The guy just failed.

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
68 points (98.6% liked)

World News

32316 readers
594 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS