269
submitted 6 months ago by Assian_Candor@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 79 points 6 months ago

This might be sincere, but as someone who worked in M&A in a past life, it’s pretty standard to say “I’m not interested in selling” to bluff the price up a bit.

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 66 points 6 months ago

Thing is, it's only the US that would be threatening to ban it. And if they sell, this FreedumbTok would be available in most other countries. It would create a world-class competitor overnight, exactly equivalent to their product, that would also have a gigantic competitive advantage- access to US consumers and businesses. FreedumbTok would likely eat away at TikTok in the rest of the world. They won't sell

[-] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 4 points 6 months ago

TikTok in the US is already separate than TikTok globally. Right now ByteDance(Singapore) owns USDS(US) that controls all domestic operations & data storage.

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 50 points 6 months ago

My understanding is that the algorithm at the core of TikTok cannot be ecported from China without the approval of Chinese regulators, and it seems pretty likely that they'll not approve a sale at gunpoint.

It also makes sense to me that they'd rather just amputate their US operations to preserve their IP and prevent an American competitor from fighting over their market share everywhere else.

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 26 points 6 months ago

it seems pretty likely that they'll not approve a sale at gunpoint

This seems like the issue to me: if the U.S. can force this sale at a deadline-discounted price, what would stop the U.S. from doing this to every Chinese company that has success in the U.S.?

[-] buckykat@hexbear.net 27 points 6 months ago

The US already banned Huawei when they started competing with the big US flagship phone brands

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I might be wrong but I think their data centers are in the US and there's not really that complicated of an algorithm, just a lot of raw data on what each user likes/watches

[-] LanyrdSkynrd@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I don't think the algorithms are the valuable part of social media sites. It's the active users that make up the network effects. Meta has likely already figured out the algorithms already, Instagram reels is struggling because creators go where the viewers are and viewers spend the most time on the platform that has their favorite creators.

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah tech companies all want to present themselves as having created a very clever and scientific "algorithm" when really they're just hoarding personal data and exploiting the network effect to entrench themselves. Google web search is actually one of the more complicated algorithms because of the variety of types of results on the open internet, but even they are completely reliant on just troves and troves of user behavior data. If 80 people Google something and 2 people Bing it, Google has way better information on what results should be on top.

[-] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago

They use Oracle data centers in Texas and Virginia

[-] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 47 points 6 months ago

I can't imagine there's that many suitors for this thing, it's a big bite

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
269 points (100.0% liked)

news

23555 readers
727 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS