141
TIL that Gwyneth Paltrow is not just a harmless grifter (arstechnica.com)
submitted 6 months ago by sgibson5150@slrpnk.net to c/todayilearned@lemmy.ml
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I never went as far as to defend Gwyneth Paltrow, but after her Hot Ones appearance I created a post (which I will link in the comments) where I suggested that she's done no more harm than male grifters and that the dislike of her as a person was primarily due to misogyny. That's before I learned about her promotion of these unproven "vampire facials". Now an unlicensed clinic performing this procedure has given at least three women HIV. You guys were right and I was wrong.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago

I mean, yeah, she's to blame for promoting an obviously batshit crazy process, but she was NOT involved with any of the facilities distributing HIV. That's a bit of a stretch.

It would be like, I dunno, blaming your favorite tattooed celebrity because you got hepatitis c from some back alley artist.

[-] sgibson5150@slrpnk.net 53 points 6 months ago

I see what you're saying, but the treatment is unproven even under sanitary conditions and she probably helped make people aware of it using her largish social media platform. I say she deserves at least some of the blame.

[-] Ledivin@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Tbf, it's more like the tattooed celebrity was promoting back alley artists. It's a weird middle ground

[-] psud@aussie.zone -5 points 6 months ago

I understand that she said it was a good and helpful procedure.

I don't think it's at all fair to say she told people to go to unlicensed places

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
141 points (84.4% liked)

Today I learned

7585 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
sonder@lemmy.ml