183

No climate crisis agreement at G20 environment meeting (phys.org)

submitted 1 year ago by fox@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

I’m shocked! Who could’ve seen this coming?? /s

But seriously, the world is fucking boiling right now and these people can’t agree to some standards?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

The old men who run the world don't care because they'll be dead soon anyway.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Normal old people still care, because they care about the world and the people they love, whether or not they're still around. Sociopathic corporate and political leaders, however, don't care. The issue is not so much the age as the pathological selfishness that got them into those positions in the first place.

[-] markr@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Plus they understand that they will be safe while the peasants go through the polycrisis’ genocide .

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

People who think they'll be safe while everyone else suffers are just as deluded as those who think there is no climate crisis.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I read an article a while back about tech bros talking about surviving after "the big event" and they couldn't figure out how to stop their security forces from rebelling and not kowtowing to some wimpy tech bro after society collapses. They came up with ideas like restricting food access and, I'm not joking, exploding collars. These people are idiots.

[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Yep, age doesn't matter here. Just look at Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos. They're young-ish and have no problem with watching the world burn.

[-] Rhaedas@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Much more than watching.

[-] designated_fridge@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Pff, this has to do with people caring more about their polling numbers than the environment.

Actually saving the environment requires some hard sacrifices and it's hard to be the elected leader who tells their voters that they're going to pay more and get less.

But in non-democratic countries you're right of course.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People that would lose a tiny margin of their profits would absolutely let the world burn instead, along with all biodiversity.

So, water & food related ~~mass migrations~~ war, here we come!

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023

183 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39129 readers

725 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.