73
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 6 months ago

It really wouldn't though. Nuclear winter would mean starvation for most of humanity.

[-] KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Perhaps my info on this was a little old, and seeing as my country might be one of the few to not have mass starvation in such a scenario, according to one of the studies I saw, I might have also been too optimistic about other countries' chances.

It seems nuclear winter could lead to an 8 degree maximum drop in temperature with a 4 degree drop after a decade and lasting a while. Perhaps. So, much worse than climate change at the current time.

Although I do still wonder about how close to reality the soot modeling is due to possible new materials and differences from countries, which might make a big difference on the actual result, either for better or worse.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, nuclear winter is going to be much worse than the global warming. The soot modelling is based on what we see happening after volcanic eruptions, so it's not going to be that far off. However, the fact that we don't know just how bad it gets underscores the risk for all humanity here. We are talking about billions of people dying as a result.

this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
73 points (94.0% liked)

World News

2307 readers
108 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS