546
Nature [Last Place Comics]
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
546 points (97.4% liked)
Comic Strips
12497 readers
1826 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I don't think I understand the last 3 panels. Is it intentionally vague, or is it a reference to something?
The animals are doing a cute thing and given the context of the previous panels, that means something bad. The TV narrator gave the viewers some time to marinate in their suspicion before confirming (via disappointed nodding) that they should not find the bird sitting on a frog cute, but sad. The whole comic is a reference to nature documentaries. Where the events depicted in them are usually tragic despite the animals potentially being cute/endearing
Hm I guess I did get it, but was wondering if there's an actual, tragic circumstance that causes birds, frogs, and turtles to pile up lol. Thank you for the in depth explanation!
I don't think any of the behaviors shown are real.
But the first two seem plausible!
Agreed
The three were left to die, being abandoned by their previous social group. However they banded together and formed a music band. On their way to the big city they found an abandoned house and wanted to shelter for the night. Inside however were thieves and bandits, celebrating their latest heist. So the band of musicians stacked on top of each other, entered the home and each let out their most horrifying scream. Utterly befuddled and scared shitless of such an unknown three-headed creature, the bandits fled.
Now after having rested, the band of musicians is on their merry way towards the big city to earn their claim to fame.
Everything seems fine. However... Unbeknownst to them, they are now on the hitlist of one of the most dangerous mafia organisations of Bremen.
This just sounds like a dnd campaign
the dnd campaigns of old
The ambiguity completely kills whatever this might've been.
The only good joke is a fully explained joke!
I love that you're likely getting upvotes from people who are taking you literally.
My interpretation is that those animals are engaged in some very kinky inter-species sexy time, and the narrator is shaming them for watching.