-23
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm legit confused

The grey guy on the left is all the shills on Lemmy pretending that not voting for Biden is helping the Palestinians, and saying they care so much about Gaza that they don't want to vote for Biden

And the guy on the right is pointing out that not voting for Biden will make things ten times worse for the Palestinians (as it will for many other people the world over)

Right?

Based on who OP is, I don't think that's what they meant, but that is for real the only semicoherent interpretation of this meme I can come up with

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Not just worse for the Palestinians, but worse here at home as well.

"I don't want genocide!"

Your choices are Biden - who supports Israel despite their bad actions, and Trump - who supports Israels bad actions, wants them to be EVEN WORSE, and wants to enact those same policies in the US.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

If you had to choose between continuing shipments to Israel or Biden winning the 2024 election what would you choose?

Purely hypothetical question here. Any similarities to reality are purely circumstantial.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Is this a trick question, or a joke I'm not understanding or something?

I would choose Biden winning in 2024 and no continuing weapons shipments to Israel.

As would like 90% of Lemmy as far as I can tell.

What am I missing?

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

As would like 99% of Lemmy as far as I can tell.

Ehhh maybe 60%.

What am I missing?

Pose this question around here and there. It's ridiculously funny how many people cannot answer it.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Because you're not asking a proper question.

It's like as if you asked whether you'd vote for a banana or an octopus.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As would like 99% of Lemmy as far as I can tell.

Ehhh maybe 60%.

I edited it down to 90%. I think there's about 10% who misunderstand Biden's domestic policies enough that they think he's been destructive to unions or something, and so they feel reluctant to say they want him to win even against a clear catastrophe.

Do you honestly think there are a bunch of people (40% or 4% or 0.4%) on Lemmy who like weapons shipments to Israel? What are you basing this on? I've seen one person on Mastodon who seemed like they'd bought into a lot of the propaganda that discredits news about what's happening to the Palestinians, and honestly believed the IDF was fighting a normal lawful war against armed opponents. That one person represents probably about 0.1% or less of the accounts I've interacted with; I have not seen any other person who I think would be in favor of aid to Israel.

But that is my experience; maybe I am missing something.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Check my comment history where I've asked this question. You'll see several examples of people:

  1. Dipping out and never answering.
  2. Making up a third choice.
  3. Telling me that real life doesn't have such binary choices.

Honestly I think because it’s just a sort of disorienting question. Ask “Do you want aid to Israel?” and I think you’ll see more of a unanimous consensus than you could achieve on almost any other issue.

Fair enough that may be true. I'll keep toying with the language and see if it makes a noticeable difference.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

It might just be that it's a really stupid question

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

Why? Because you aren't able to make a choice?

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean, it is a counterfactual question in a way that makes people want to take a step back from it instead of just buying into the premise and giving a straight answer. The likely outcomes are Biden + aid for Israel, or Trump + aid for Israel, so separating Biden from aid to Israel sort of comes across like a non sequitur.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

All fair points but you were able to make a decision ultimately.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 6 months ago

I'll keep toying with the language and see if it makes a noticeable difference.

Why not just ask, "Do you support aid to Israel?" What is the point of constructing this counterfactual and confusing choice? It's not a language issue, it's a "why is that the question you're asking" issue.

It's like, do you want Biden but with the support for Israel taken out of the equation? You're gonna get a whole lot of people who keep slamming the "yes" button until it breaks if you ask that. Why do you think that would be a difficult question or a gotcha or something?

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's establishing a priority. Their answer demonstrates if sending weapons to Israel is more important to them than Biden winning the 2024 election.

Some people cannot answer this question. Prioritizing Israel opens them up to the same accusations of supporting Trump they've thrown at others. Prioritizing Biden winning means they'd have to vote for someone who isn't doing what they want. Either way it casts doubt on their perceived self image.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Who is it that you think wants to prioritize sending weapons to Israel?

It's like "Do you want this scone, or for me to shit on your carpet?" The number of people outside of niche communities who have uncertainty about the choice is not gonna be real significant (although some may answer it by expressing confusion about the question in the first place instead of just saying, the scone.)

I don't know why I spent this amount of time on this bizarre conversation, but on the off chance that you sincerely hold these beliefs and think this is a relevant question, I hope you find the enlightenment about it that you seek.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm telling you. Check my comment history.

Who is it that you think wants to prioritize sending weapons to Israel?

I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Most Republicans (except MAGA) I'm sure. And a good percentage of Democrat voters. I suspect lots of those Democrat voters voted for Joe Biden in the 2020 primaries.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 6 months ago

Therrrrre it is

After some extended conversation we've arrived at why you want to ask the question in this particular convoluted way: Because you want to imply a particular narrative, where having a more direct version of the conversation would instantly expose that what you're trying to imply is a bunch of crap.

I asked the straightforward version of your question, the answer to which you can check out, in the unlikely-to-me event that you seriously believe what you're saying here.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Because you want to imply a particular narrative

... Are you new to political discussions? That's everybody.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Everybody who's a phony, a big fat phony, maybe.

And one hallmark of the big fat phonies is that they try to claim everyone else is a big fat phony, too.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Maybe we're talking about different things. I'm defining a narrative as the way someone describes how they perceive something. If I tell you how I think the world works that's a narrative. And in a political conversation most people engage in the hopes of either finding someone who agrees with their narrative or hopes to convince someone of their narrative.

Do you disagree with that?

By the way, your comments are getting a bit more aggressive and it's unwarranted. I haven't called you any names so there's no need to call me any. If you do it again we can just end the conversation.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 6 months ago

the way someone describes how they perceive something

I don't think you actually think that lots of people on Lemmy support Israel. I think you know that the general opinion is wildly anti-Israel (as it should be), and you're deliberately linking "Biden" to "Israel" by pretending to misunderstand what you're seeing, in the hope that the anti-Israel sentiment will translate to anti-Biden sentiment by pure word association.

That's what I meant by "a narrative" -- maybe it would have been more accurate for me to say "a dishonest propaganda narrative" instead, to distinguish it from the simple factual description of a narrative that you gave.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

I don’t think you actually think that lots of people on Lemmy support Israel.

Ok. I'm not sure what to do with that.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 6 months ago

You can go look and see whether this belief you profess would be an accurate belief to hold

If it is actually something that you think is happening, I think you want to take a step back and reexamine whatever it was that led you to think that in the first place.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Because one of the troll accounts is trying to say Biden-supporters here mostly support giving weapons to Israel,

Go fuck yourself man.

[-] Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

I mean, they've been shipping weapons to Israel under Biden so your question is kinda moot.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Are you unable to make a decision?

this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
-23 points (32.3% liked)

Political Memes

5424 readers
1798 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS