235
submitted 5 months ago by clot27@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Here's what he said in a post on his telegram channel:

🤫 A story shared by Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter, uncovered that the current leaders of Signal, an allegedly “secure” messaging app, are activists used by the US state department for regime change abroad 🥷

🥸 The US government spent $3M to build Signal’s encryption, and today the exact same encryption is implemented in WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Google Messages and even Skype. It looks almost as if big tech in the US is not allowed to build its own encryption protocols that would be independent of government interference 🐕‍🦺

🕵️‍♂️ An alarming number of important people I’ve spoken to remarked that their “private” Signal messages had been exploited against them in US courts or media. But whenever somebody raises doubt about their encryption, Signal’s typical response is “we are open source so anyone can verify that everything is all right”. That, however, is a trick 🤡

🕵️‍♂️ Unlike Telegram, Signal doesn’t allow researchers to make sure that their GitHub code is the same code that is used in the Signal app run on users’ iPhones. Signal refused to add reproducible builds for iOS, closing a GitHub request from the community. And WhatsApp doesn’t even publish the code of its apps, so all their talk about “privacy” is an even more obvious circus trick 💤

🛡 Telegram is the only massively popular messaging service that allows everyone to make sure that all of its apps indeed use the same open source code that is published on Github. For the past ten years, Telegram Secret Chats have remained the only popular method of communication that is verifiably private 💪

Original post: https://t.me/durov/274

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] firefly@neon.nightbulb.net 29 points 5 months ago

Telegram: We keep you private. Now enter your phone number to sign up.

[-] SLfgb@feddit.nl 19 points 5 months ago
[-] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago

That breaks anonymity, not privacy

[-] Ferk@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You mean "confidentiality", not privacy.
Just the metadata related to whether you personally, traceable to your full name and address, have a Signal account and how much you use it might be considered a privacy breach already, even if the content of the messages is confidential.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online -5 points 5 months ago

It breaks both

[-] Ferk@kbin.social 4 points 5 months ago

Signal is the same in that regards.

[-] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 5 months ago
[-] Matt@lemdro.id 2 points 5 months ago

Signal still requires a phone number to use it. What they recently added is the ability to message people without needing to know their phone number.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

Oh, that sucks. My bad.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
235 points (80.4% liked)

Privacy

31601 readers
544 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS