68

A new study provides some theoretical underpinning to warp drives, suggesting that the superfast propulsion tech may not forever elude humanity.

Sci-fi fans โ€” especially "Star Trek" devotees โ€” are familiar with warp drives. These hypothetical engines manipulate the fabric of space-time itself, compressing the stuff in front of a spaceship and expanding it behind. This creates a "warp bubble" that allows a craft to travel at incredible velocities โ€” in some imaginings, many times faster than the speed of light.

In 1994, Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre published a groundbreaking paper that laid out how a real-life warp drive could work. This exciting development came with a major caveat, however: The proposed "Alcubierre drive" required negative energy, an exotic substance that may or may not exist (or, perhaps, the harnessing of dark energy, the mysterious force that seems to be causing the universe's accelerated expansion).

Alcubierre published his idea in Classical and Quantum Gravity. Now, a new paper in the same journal suggests that a warp drive may not require exotic negative energy after all.

"This study changes the conversation about warp drives," lead author Jared Fuchs, of the University of Alabama, Huntsville and the research think tank Applied Physics, said in a statement. "By demonstrating a first-of-its-kind model, we've shown that warp drives might not be relegated to science fiction."

The team's model uses "a sophisticated blend of traditional and novel gravitational techniques to create a warp bubble that can transport objects at high speeds within the bounds of known physics," according to the statement.

Understanding that model is probably beyond most of us; the paper's abstract, for example, says that the solution "involves combining a stable matter shell with a shift vector distribution that closely matches well-known warp drive solutions such as the Alcubierre metric."

The proposed engine could not achieve faster-than-light travel, though it could come close; the statement mentions "high but subluminal speeds."

This is a single modeling study, so don't get too excited. Even if other research teams confirm that the math reported in the new study checks out, we're still very far from being able to build an actual warp drive.

Fuchs and his team admit as much, stressing that their work could end up being a stepping stone on the long road to efficient interstellar flight.

"While we're not yet preparing for interstellar voyages, this research heralds a new era of possibilities," Gianni Martire, CEO of Applied Physics, said in the same statement. "We're continuing to make steady progress as humanity embarks on the Warp Age."

The team's study was published online on April 29. You can find it here, though all but the abstract is behind a paywall; a free preprint version is available via arXiv.org.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

An Alcubierre drive doesn't move faster than light, it compresses the space in front of a ship and expands the space behind it.

There's a whole bunch of theoretical problems though, like potentially killing everyone inside the bubble with hawking radiation, or destroying everything at the destination with high energy particles.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago

Also requiring as much energy as exists in the entire universe to generate said field. It's theoretically possible, but the math doesn't even let us pretend it's something we can actually accomplish.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

That's literally what the article is about. A new paper has theoretically found a way to operate a variation of that drive without the need for exotic matter.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 0 points 6 months ago

The article is about sub-light speed. The Alcubierre drive is about a theoretical way to travel faster than the speed of light by hacking yoir surrounding space to move instead of you.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Just read the article...

[-] DdCno1@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

The potential issues could result in only unmanned probes using this drive far away from planets - which would still be immensely useful, e.g. for automated space exploration and fast interstellar communication.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Or, we quickly invented near light speed doomsday weapons

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

Would be kinda embarrassing to obliterate the first alien species we encounter because we accidentally parked our probe too close to their planet.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

There's lot's of reasons to suspect FTL can't work in any way, for any vessel. The suspicion is that these solutions only show up in GR because it neglects unknown quantum effects that ultimately keep things nice and paradox-free.

this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
68 points (92.5% liked)

Futurology

1760 readers
90 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS