552
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Republican county commissioner has been unseated in Michigan after losing to her Democratic challenger by 20 percentage points.

Chris Kleinjans won an Ottawa County election on Tuesday with 60 percent of the vote share, while the Republican incumbent Lucy Ebel lost, having received 40 percent.

Michigan is a battleground state that will be key to November's presidential election. Donald Trump won the county with 61 percent of the vote in 2020.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Michigan is a battleground state that will be key to November’s presidential election.

Friendly reminder that, thanks to the US-backed genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, we saw fully 13% of Democrats refuse to support Joe Biden in the Michigan primary

This, in a state where Democrat primary turnout was 768,158 relative to Republican primary turnout of 1,113,719.

This war is going to Jimmy Carter the Democrats in November, if they don't change course in a hurry.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

13% of democrats submitted a protest vote. That is not the same as refusing to vote for Biden in November. I hope that anyone who supports the Palestinian cause can recognize just how much worse it will get under a Trump administration.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Lol unless Biden changes course, SE Michigan alone will ensure his loss of the state.

Dearborn does not screw around and will happily take 4 years of Trump if their demands are not met. They were very aware of Hillary's sketchy past as Secretary of State when she ran in 2016 and she lost Michigan because only 10k people didn't vote for her.

And iirc the total turnout was already like 400k less compared to Obama.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

That is not the same as refusing to vote for Biden in November.

That's a clear signal by registered Democrats of their abstention of support for Biden.

House Reps aren't seeing these huge protest votes.

I hope that anyone who supports the Palestinian cause can recognize just how much worse it will get under a Trump

I hope that Biden realizes he can't wait until 2025 to change course in Palestine. Not when 1.4M lives are on the line.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not really, this is the damage to your brain that insufficient evidence can cause. Michigan has a storied history of large "Uncommitted" votes in uncontested primaries. For example, "Uncommitted" picked up 16.08% of the vote against Obama in 2012. If anything, this is evidence that support for Biden is stronger that would be expected in Michigan.

Also, you claim it's evidence that registered Democrats are abandoning Biden; Michigan has an open primary.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Michigan has a storied history of large “Uncommitted” votes in uncontested primaries.

For example, “Uncommitted” picked up 16.08% of the vote against Obama in 2012.

They picked up 10% and in an election year with 70% lower turnout. And Obama shed 300k votes from his 2008 high. Incidentally, Hillary shed 300,000 additional votes relative to Obama's 2012 performance. A state that was safely blue decayed to red thanks to growing dissatisfaction in the Dem base. It wasn't until 2020 that Dems recovered.

Also, you claim it’s evidence that registered Democrats are abandoning Biden

If voting against the incumbent isn't a sign of abandonment, I'm not sure what else is. Certainly the Nikki Haley Republicans are a shot across Trump's bow.

Perhaps Dems are just banking on a historically low turnout year overall. But no matter how you slice it, Biden's support has waned considerably from 2020. He's not going to hit that 2.8M mark again.

[-] RalphFurley@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Should we tell him?

this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
552 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2167 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS