79
Which Android mobile phone brand brings less pre-loaded 3rd-party apps?
(lemmy.lukeog.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
79 points (93.4% liked)
Privacy
32024 readers
1424 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
No they're not. Have you actually bought a newer Pixel and used it without a custom ROM? They are loaded with extra Google applications and features now. It's a very different experience to several years ago when everyone referred to Pixels as "stock" Android. Motorola phones have a more "stock" experience than Pixels now.
Motorola phones: asop + google + Motorola
Pixel phones: asop + google
Asop flashing pixel only: asop
How is the risk surface lower on a Motorola phone?
That's not true, though. Motorola phones do not contain all the same Google features and applications as Pixels and the way in which their first-party applications are embedded in the OS is less significant than the way in which Google embeds theirs.
EDIT: Your risk surface question is also a strawman and shifting the goalposts. Neither myself nor OP made was making an argument about risk surface.
I see we are talking about very different things when we talk about bloat.
If Google play has super control of the phone I consider that bloat and a huge risk surface.
You are describing basically all phones, including Pixels. If you want to flash AOSP or some custom ROM, fine, but that's not an "out of the box" experience as you originally claimed.
It's the least amount of trusted parties you can get on Android phone. Since every android sold outside of China has Google play as super root anyway, limiting the trusted parties to one is the least bloated you can get... And that's pixel. If you want AOSP. That's also pixel, the only phone with pure AOSP builds available
I guess the disagreement here is coming from how we define a "clean" experience. Based on my recent use of phones from both manufacturers, the Motorola phone allowed me to disable and uninstall more stuff without breaking the core UX, hence it was a cleaner experience. Motorola doesn't really impose itself on the user, in that sense.
Alternatively Pixels are really designed to be used by people fully integrated within Google's ecosystem. When you start attempting to escape that it becomes a pretty annoying experience and one that I would not define as "clean". It's increasingly akin to using a Samsung phone with OneUI, which is similarly insistent on you using all it's baked-in, exclusive first-party features (many of which requite an account or enable additional tracking).