191

Trying to shame a group of people for simply existing is actually just vile and resentful hate and not a part of "civil debate"? Who woulda thunk it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Chuds really like to virtue signal about "debate" and freeze-peach but it's really just a cover for legitimizing bigotry and fascism.

[-] Angel@hexbear.net 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And if you refuse to entertain that shit, they'll go on about how they "owned" you, but in actuality, they're like:

this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
191 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13556 readers
851 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS