217
Astronomers are on the Hunt for Dyson Spheres
(www.universetoday.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
217 points (98.2% liked)
Space
8669 readers
115 users here now
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
๐ญ Science
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
- !space@lemmy.world
๐ Engineering
๐ Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Wouldn't a Dyson swarm be much easier to construct than either? Like a dyson sphere but a swarm of smaller collectors.
A swam doesn't produce anywhere near the real estate though. So I guess it really depends entirely on why the megastructure was built, if it's only for energy extraction then yeah, a Dyson swarm makes the most sense. But if they also want to use it for habitation then it's not a really great idea. Sure you can spread space station's throughout the swarm, but then groups in space station A are always going to find it difficult to interact with groups in space station B, no matter how commonplace space travel is. It would be like intentionally building two cities on either side of a canyon, and saying it's okay because aircraft exist.