626

Would be funny if Winamp gets a second life ~20 later.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 130 points 1 year ago

It doesn't say what license they are going to use, so it may not be open source. The wording is very weaselly.

[-] monobot@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago

This is news from September and linked blog post from December. Nothing happened.

[-] invisiblegorilla@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 year ago

Winamp has announced that on 24 September 2024, the application's source code will be open to developers worldwide.

[-] Xabis@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Winamp has announced that on 24 September 2024, the application's source code will be open to developers worldwide.

The date is given on the page, which hasn’t lapsed yet.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago

They’re probably spending intervening 10 months cleaning all the embarrassing comments out of the code before the initial commit.

[-] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Good find, I honestly didn't notice that this was from Dec 2023.

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

it shows "Dec 16, 1" when I open the link, but the first time I saw someone post it, the date on the screenshot said "May 16, 2024 - 08:30 CEST": https://social.treehouse.systems/@amie/112452636130622939

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

IMHO, it sounds like it'll be "Source Available." Especially

Winamp will remain the owner of the software and will decide on the innovations made in the official version.

[-] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Would this allow a fork under a different name or would it have to be rewritten, replacing all original code, like Unix?

[-] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If they chose an open source license, a fork under a different name would be possible (else it's not open source).

Their wording is ambiguous, so maybe they only talk about keeping the name/trademark to themselves, which is definitely a good choice.

It's also not clear if they accept contributions, but they'll likely keep deciding what features should get added or not.

At least that's how I understand it.

this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
626 points (98.6% liked)

Open Source

39518 readers
106 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS