460
submitted 5 months ago by naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

People have the right to have children, regardless of if the circumstances they'll be brought up in are up to your approval. To say they shouldn't have that right is not pro-choice, it's anti-natalist.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 3 points 5 months ago

Yes and who denies them having children?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 months ago
[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

But you were literally pointing that out? Or would you say that your entire point is irrelevant and should be dismissed?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 months ago

No one is presently stopping people from having kids, but that doesn't mean that anti-natalism doesn't exist.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

Mhm...

Looks OP antinatalism

Yup I sure do exist. But that doesn't mean I would enforce others to not have kids.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

Well, there you have it. Your position is wrong and awful, and I'm opposed to it and have no problem saying so. That's that.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

My position is awful because I decided for myself that I don't want kids? The fuck is wrong with you Mr Moral Apostle?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

That's not what anti-natalism is.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

Okay then I assumed wrong, my bad.

this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
460 points (97.9% liked)

World News

32283 readers
1158 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS