195
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
195 points (78.4% liked)
Memes
45731 readers
1705 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Well, well, well. If it isn't the exact non-answer I was expecting to get from that question. (Albeit with more spelling mistakes)
I'm not from the US, smartypants.
To answer your question: Electoralism is IMHO a waste of time. I'd ratherbe politically active e.g. in a union.
So? You're snarkily commenting on the actions of a US citizen.
The fact remains that there's work to be done by the people and it will either happen under Biden or Trump.
One of those options is clearly more inhabitable than the other.
You being from another country and sowing political discord isn't the gotcha you think it is.
You were asking me what I was about to do in the coming 4 years, probably concerning US politics.
Again: You were adressing me.
It's not about inhability. It's about a system that's in constant peril of sliding into fascism isn't worth defending.
I'm not trying to do that. This is an international meme community about politics (nowhere it's specified that it's exclusively about US politics). If I'm not allowed to show my political beliefs here: where can I show them?
Trust me: I'd rather no nothing about the politics of that failed state. But here we are with the world police noticing that it has - like all police - a fascism problem. ๐
Yeah, shame on me for assuming you were commenting on something that mattered to you. Egg on my face for not recognizing that you're just cackling from the sidelines.
Then you're either saying there's no way to fix that system (which is pointless and petulant). Or that there's work to do beyond voting to make those fixes (which, see my previous comment)
Then frankly, it's not clear what you're actually trying to do. Whatever it is, its coming off as pointless and annoying at best and deliberately divisive at worst.
I beg to differ: POSIWID
The system is beyond saving and is working as intended. Build dual power outside of electoralism. Incidently: that's what I'm planning to do.
Fancy, semantic way of getting right back to my point which was "this system bad > change to different system".
Is that clearer for you?