34
submitted 2 years ago by edge@hexbear.net to c/earth@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] edge@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

That’s a reasonable assumption, but it was already clearly a problem before the Soviet Union collapsed.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago

IIRC the USSR had planned to line the rivers with concrete and build other devices so there would be less loss.

Those never got built, and there was even less ability to do so after the collapse.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

ive heard alternatively that the cotton was important for domestic consumer goods or export in the USSR, in either case they made a short sighted decision that was seen to be more important than the preserving an unexploitable salty sea

this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

Earth

13180 readers
14 users here now

The world’s #1 planet!

A community for the discussion of the environment, climate change, ecology, sustainability, nature, and pictures of cute wild animals.

Socialism is the only path out of the global ecological crisis.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS