250
submitted 5 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The most expensive PSN option was £83.99 a year last time I got it, for the full Game Pass type deal. I've bought a grand total of two games since I got my PS5 a few years ago (Baldur's Gate 3 and Talos Principle 2, and neither are even available as a physical disc making my disc drive in the console pretty pointless), and I play the damn thing just about every day.

It's completely optional in any case, I very rarely even play multiplayer games. The price you're hoping to beat is £389.

I can get an equivalent GPU (3060 12GB is about as close as you can get if you want to avoid lack of VRAM stutter) for about £270, which isn't leaving a lot for the rest of the PC. There may well be regions where the PS5 is more expensive than a PC, but the UK ain't one of them.

There are many strengths of PC gaming, like being able to buy extra hardware, modding, many digital stores, piracy, etc, but competing with consoles in the budget space is not where they shine.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

£83.99 a year In USD, the most expensive plan is $160/year. The basic plan is $80/year. Over the lifespan of the console, the basic plan plus the console itself comes out to about $1K. Already more expensive than a basic gaming PC (and much more expensive than a steamdeck). If you were gonna be getting a basic computer anyways, you could probably get a pretty reasonably high-end gaming PC with that extra money.

If the only thing you care about is the up-front costs, then consoles are cheaper, but at least in the US, that's not really true in the long-term (except for the switch) if you want basic online access. Especially if you are are going to own a decent computer regardless of whether you game or not. Personally, the only difference I would make between my current computer set-up if I didn't also play games is I wouldn't have upgraded my 9 year old GPU for $250 (3060ti*), which is cheaper than even a switch without accounting subscriptions costs (which is relatively reasonably priced at $20/year and a lot of the games I'd be interested in if it weren't for Nintendo are primarily games I'd want to play offline anyways, so the subscription isn't really that important anyways but the games like like $60/each...).

*edit: used. So a used switch would actually be cheaper as long as you don't get a few years of subscription or buy like 2 games.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago

I suspect the viability of PC gaming is very regional.

A 3060 Ti costs £384 ($490) in the UK. That's almost exactly the price of a PS5, and the reason I'm still using a 1060 6GB for my PC.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

Forgot to mention I got it used, so should be comparing it to used consoles (PS5 looks like its still about $300 for digital edition, but doesn't really matter since the subscription is most of the cost anyways), so a used switch would actually be cheaper.

this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
250 points (99.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8568 readers
489 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS