456
Here's one for the nature lovers
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
456 points (86.7% liked)
Political Memes
8469 readers
1087 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
All these "Biden is not perfect enough" comments everywhere on lemmy are quite disappointing. Start to sound like propaganda.
No one, surly not a politician, can be good enough in the eyes of purists. (And the conclusion is obvious of course)
D- do you think this meme isn't propaganda?
We're allowed to call out BS in our politicians when we see it, even the ones we voted for and plan of voting for again.
Of course this meme is a propaganda, but all these comments are all over lemmy even on serious communities. Sorry, it was a rant generally on lemmy.
No one is claiming that they are upset because he isn't perfect. Writing a blank check for Israel to kill tens of thousands of civilians is an act that most Democrats aren't happy about.
He is acting in ways that his constituents dislike, the way they show their contempt is by criticizing his actions. What about that is propaganda?
It doesn't take a purist to understand that enabling a right winged government to partake in an ethnic cleansing isn't exactly progressive policy.
Okay, but it literally is. Most Democrats remain in favor of either the current course taken by Biden, or increasing support to Israel.
For the record, while I'm happy support of Israel has decreased, it's not the simple electoral calculus many leftists on Lemmy seem to think it is. I would love it if the US electorate, or even just the Dem base, was strongly against the genocide. But by and large, we on here, who actually follow foreign affairs, are in the minority.
Wrong on every point.....
How many times have I fucking said this? Approval of Israeli military action is not the same as approval of US aid to Israel.
Although I apparently did misremember - the numbers are about even rather than a majority in favor.
That's arguing in semantics. If we have polls saying that the majority of people are paying attention, and stating they don't approve of Israel's military action. Then a poll with conflicting information with 40% of responses saying idk, means it was a shitty questionnaire. Or that's not the right questionnaire to correctly determine if Democrats approve of how bidens handling the conflict.
Also, if we are being pedantic....asking if Biden is "striking the right balance" is not the same as approval of US aid. If we want to be even more pedantic,..... US aid is not even appropriate as most people think of "aid" as humanitarian in nature. Israel doesn't need food or medicine, they need weapons.
I'd like to see a poll that ask if the US should be supplying weapons to a military that primarily have used them to kill women and children.
If there are studies that suggest a majority of people
I appreciate your willingness to discuss the matter seriously. I despise the position we're in, and support the removal of all military and financial aid from Israel. Let me finish cooking and I'll see if I can find a poll worded specifically enough to suit your criteria.
EDIT: It's actually in the Pew Poll, I just missed it, it would seem. On the issue of military aid specifically, and not just whether Biden is currently taking the 'right' path or a 'not Israeli favorable enough' path...
https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/03/PRC_2024.3.21_Israel-Hamas_2-04.png
36% in favor to 35% opposed in the general population
25% in favor of military aid to 44% opposed in the Democratic party
Okay, but is that enough to convince you that the majority of Democrats are not fans of how the Biden administration is handling the situation?
And surely if the majority of constituents disagree with this policy, it makes sense to protest against it?
I understand that a lot more than Palestine is riding on the election. What I don't understand is why people are upset at his constituents laying out perfectly valid criticism. What I don't get is people on Lemmy conflating criticisms with propaganda, and attempting to silence those criticisms.
Maybe a better person to be upset at is the elected official, who just so happens to be ignoring the majority of his party to support an ultra conservative government?
Maybe if all the people who "despise the position we're in" voiced that criticism instead of silencing others, the administration would have to change their stance...
Maybe that's the whole point of protesting in a democracy.......
Edit: on a side note, I would still like to see what happens if you asked those same people who approved of military aid, if they still approved aid knowing that it was going to be used to mostly kill innocent women and children.
Labeling it Israel vs Hamas is not accurate, as 70% of the casualties have been women and children.
We already went over "how the Biden administration is handling the situation", in which the numbers are even.
This point was specifically brought up, separately, as approval military aid, which yields a different answer.
You can say that's dumb, and it is, but that's democracy. People don't always have consistent opinions.
In any case, while I still have doubts as to whether it would be an electoral advantage for Biden to change positions, I'm more hopeful about it. And, as I've mentioned elsewhere, I'm in support of him changing positions anyway, under the justification that if it's "Damned if you do, damned if you don't, might as well at least be damned with the moral choice and not the immoral one"
My position was (and to a lesser degree, still is) just that there is not a CLEAR electoral advantage to it - it's not as simple as "Biden does this ONE THING and he WINS", especially since Gaza in particular and foreign affairs in general rate low on voter's concerns this electoral cycle.
It would make sense to protest against it even if a plurality didn't disagree. It's a citizen's duty to protest, even if they're the only one who disagrees.
Because a lot of people on here are continuously repeating 'Biden bad' on every issue, or redirecting every issue to Gaza, and then pushing "VOTE THIRD PARTY" or "DON'T VOTE" or "DEMS AND REPUBLICANS ARE JUST THE SAME", and those of us who are in line for the camps under a Trump presidency find this, at best incredibly privileged, and at worst, actively destructive, viewpoint as just a mite concerning.
Before it was Gaza, it was unions on here - by the rhetoric of many of the same players who are beating the Gaza drum on Lemmy now, you'd've thought Biden was the worst union-buster in US history, instead of a moderately-pro-Union president who's been better for labor than any other administration in probably a good half-century. And if the Gaza genocide ceases to call people's attention before the election, they'll move onto something else.
I would argue that not only is cynicism towards certain common arguments justified in that situation, but actively beneficial towards filtering the noise.
Man, I'm not against the protests. I'm fully in support of them.
I think I disputed your interpretation of that data.
No I was utilizing that information to prove that your argument was semantic in nature.
Lol, yes democracy is all about silencing your constituents..... This whole argument started over the validity of criticizing the president. You have done nothing but try to refute that in the most "enlightened centerist" way possible.
Ahh yes, electoral advantage is surely the only reasoning we should utilize when deciding if genocide is an appropriate foreign policy....
And yet, you still aid people spreading propaganda that implores people to science criticism. Sure.
I never made any claim close to that? You can fight your own straw man all by yourself.
Okay, then what is the point of your pedantic rebuttal?
And did I make any of those claims? Or are you just conflating all criticism as such?
Again, I didn't make any of those claims. Maybe people are driven to this level of criticism because they feel centerist are trying to mute all criticism from within the constituency?
Lol, you talk about a genocide as if it's a frivolous complaint and you call other people privileged?
So you're for the protest, but against people voicing their opinions on Lemmy? You have just spent several paragraphs equating the criticism against genocide as just a distraction for the election cycle.....but you support it?
Congrats on being the most "enlightened centerist" I've come across on Lemmy.
I only hope that one day you muster up enough empathy to lose sleep over stating " if the Gaza genocide ceases to call people's attention before the election, they'll move onto something else. "
Go kick rocks
Bro really called purists people who are not ok with the biggest humanitarian crisis of the 21st century.
Not to mention how he hasn't fixed any internal problems, he just didn't make things a lot worse, which is a pretty low bar to begin with.
Like in this case, we are fucking light years away from anything even remotely close to saving the environment and reversing the damage we have done, yet we have to applaud this party for not making things even worse? Like, have you seen what environmental scientists say about the situation we are in?
Gaza is not even the biggest crisis of the last 2 years. An order of magnitude more people died in the Tigray genocide and there was nary a peep from any of you back then.
Not to mention number of COVID deaths.
Why hasn't Xi stopped the largest humanitarian crisis of the 21st century?
Surely he isn't supporting the genocide.
Wait, you say all it takes to be guilty of the genocide is to 'not stop it'.
Xi is guilty of genocide.
Xi isn't funding Israel, unlike yk...the US. You really can't tell why we focus on the US rather than any other random country in the world huh? It really hasn't crossed your mind? Or you're just being extremely bad faith. Let alone the fact that noone is defending Xi's actions lmao
Xi isn't funding Israel, unlike yk...the US. You really can't tell why we focus on the US rather than any other random country in the world huh? It really hasn't crossed your mind? Or you're just being extremely bad faith
Xi isn't funding Israel, unlike yk...the US. You really can't tell why we focus on the US rather than any other random country in the world huh? It really hasn't crossed your mind? Or you're just being extremely bad faith. Let alone the fact that noone is defending Xi's actions lmao
It’s not exactly Biden’s fault that he’s being propped up and foisted upon us by the establishment, but they really picked a poor candidate for an election that is supposedly the most important one of our lives. Almost like the DNC doesn’t mind losing.
Consider AZ, where a dem senate candidate is up in polling, and Biden is down by like 12 points. For that matter, polls show him losing in every swing state, which is where it matters due to electoral college bs. Or just the fact that he is now frequently confusing things he did as vice president with things he’s done as president, while publicly speaking. He even still gets confused about his son dying in war, which didn’t happen…Beau died at home from a brain aneurysm.
For the good of the nation, we need a few more degrees of separation between “good enough,” and one foot in the grave.
You mean the voters picked. By voting for him. Because they did that. They voted for Hillary too. By voting. For the candidate they genuinely wanted more or at least were least unenthusiastic about.
What voters? There was no primary election (in good faith).
Hillary who? Is she friends with Debbie Wasserman Schultz?
"Stop the steal!"
"Stop counting ~~black~~ low information voters!"
"Let's do the very very socialist thing of counting donations instead of ballots, thereby inaugurating an actual donor class oligarchy! By the way have I told you about my issues with the establishment being complicit in donor class influence over public policy?"
Well the first two are abhorrent, but you’re onto something with that last one. At least it’d be honest.
It's okay to admit you don't understand how primaries work.
Just say it.
You don't understand how primaries work.
There's definitely a concerted effort to discourage people from voting against Trump by focusing on anything not-perfect about Biden, yeah. I mean, they know they can't get these people to vote for Trump, that'd be too much for them, but if they can get enough people not to vote against him, then they can tilt things in his favor. And they know that progressives have always been a little bit inclined toward giving up in frustration whenever something isn't as good as it should be.
Russian, Chinese, and North Korean troll farms are at all time highs. They parrot and amplify any existing criticism till it’s all you see. This is far more than organic descent.
I really hoped it'll not infect lemmy.
Lmao, the cretins running this shit show want that.
Watch as hexbear deny uyghur genocide and .ml calls to nuke 'the west'.
I thought MAGA pricks were low-brow knuckle dragging sycophants. BOY was I wrong about who is at the top of that pack.