448

Jerry Seinfeld’s week of difficult appearances continues, this time in Virginia.

As soon as Seinfeld took the stage for a stand-up comedy set at Chrysler Hall in Norfolk on Saturday night, a man in the audience jumped up and yelled, “Free Gaza,” TMZ reported. The audience immediately began booing the heckler and chanting “Jerry! Jerry!” as another bystander wrestled the protester into a headlock.

Security escorted the man out of the building, but the show was interrupted by other protesters eight times throughout its 90-minute run.

The controversy around Seinfeld’s views stems from his vocal support of Israel — which he visited following the Oct. 7 attacks — and his wife’s $5,000 donation to a GoFundMe for pro-Israel counterprotesters at UCLA after a late April protest turned violent.

Seinfeld didn’t seem bothered by the interruptions, telling the crowd not to boo the man because he had a right to protest.

“This is exciting. I like this,” the comic said as the original protester was escorted out of the venue. “I like a little Jew hate to spice up the show.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca -4 points 5 months ago

Both sides of the equation need to be pushed back against.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Not everything needs to be "both sides."

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca -3 points 5 months ago

You scrolled past somebody stating in this very thread that they don't recognize the right of Israel to exist.

You could have spent a single minute of your day pushing against the ridiculousness of that statement. Instead, you scrolled down and decided to push back on something less ridiculous.

They both deserved push back, but you only chose to push back against the side you aren't on.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Why is it my personal job to challenge every statement?

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca -3 points 5 months ago

You are one of the most active users on the site who spends probably more time than anybody challenging Israel supporters.

But challenging the side you are on when they say clearly abhorrent things?... Slim pickings.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

That doesn't explain why it's my job. Unless you're going to pay me to do otherwise, I think I'll continue to reply to who I want to reply to.

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca -3 points 5 months ago

If it isn't your job to somehow find a way to speak out against the most milquetoast barely pro-Israel comments made on Lemmy, it's certainly at least your hobby.

I just think you could put 1% of your time here towards speaking out against the comments you see that are wrong when they come from your side.

But, partisanism is like a drug.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Shall I go through your comment history to see what you've been unevenly commenting on? Because I'm willing to. I'm guessing I'll find quite the treasure trove.

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 months ago

Go ahead. I'm mostly on your side of the conflict. Largely because of the work you have put in here. You are respected here and have changed minds.

I just think if arguing against pro-Israel people the second they step out of line is going to be your hobby, you should be doing the same when you see it coming from your own side.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Whereas I think declaring something to be my hobby when it isn't that at all is exceedingly rude. So I don't think I'll take the advice of someone who is being exceedingly rude to me.

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca -3 points 5 months ago

If you want to pretend the person who gave you credit for changing their mind is being rude to you, that's fine.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yes. I do want to "pretend" the person telling me what my hobbies are and berating me for spending time here is being exceedingly rude. You don't even know what is going on in my life and you assumed instead of asked. Too late now. I'm done here. Go be a jerk to someone else.

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If I realized you would take offense at the word I used to describe how you choose to spend your time, I wouldn't have used the word.

I'm not criticizing you for what you are doing. I think you have done a lot of good. I just think you are very forgiving of awful behavior among people who hold the same beliefs you do, when you should realize they respect you and likely wouldn't engage I'm that behavior if you chose to say something.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

There's nothing remotely ridiculous about saying that an apartheid ethnostate does not have a right to exist.

[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Frankly, no nation has an inherent right to exist, and that includes Israel. A nation is only legitimate as long as it looks after the interests and liberties of its people. All its people. At the end of the day, I don't give a flying fuck at a rolling donut if Israel exists, Palestine exists, or some combination of the two, or neither. What I care about is that the people who live there have long, happy, free, and peaceful lives, and right now Israel seems to be the biggest obstacle to that, what with the genocide and all.

this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
448 points (94.6% liked)

News

23281 readers
4631 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS