19
UK government bans private puberty blocker prescriptions for trans youth
(www.thepinknews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
19 points (88.0% liked)
United Kingdom
4060 readers
177 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Puberty blockers sure are funny old things, somehow they're safe to prescribe to cis kids, but when prescribed to trans kids they suddenly become dangerous. I'm sure this is a purely evidence based policy. It must be. Wes Streeting has already endorsed it and, as people on here keep saying, Labour are the trans-friendly™ option. They wouldn't just throw trans kids under the bus.
Transkids get access to these drugs just as easily as ciskids.
I mean, not if they're banned as per the OP, surely? Not sure what you mean here?
They aren't banned for use as a treatment for precocious puberty, which presumably is something anyone can suffer from trans or otherwise.
Yeah but they're banned for use for kids who suffer from gender dysphoria, which is a condition that by definition only trans kids have, so it's absolutely restricting access to them exclusively for trans kids, and to rub salt in on the wound, the use of what the government calls "dangerous" (and TERFs who dictate policy and the media line call "experimental" and "untested" and fearmonger about non-existent negative side effects) will continue on cis kids, because their lives and their struggles are seen as worth more than the trans kids', as was already evident to trans folks, with how the fearmongering about hypothetical harm to >1% of trans people who detransition conveniently forgets about those 99% who would - and often already do today - suffer very real harm from treatment withheld.
They aren't banned for kids who suffer from dysphoria. They are banned from being used as a treatment for dysphoria. Important difference.
That is a pointless difference in practice, because kids who suffer from gender dysphoria would use these meds for treatment of said dysphoria and do in the rest of the world that follows the expert guidance from WPATH, and now they can't, and the kids will suffer as a result. But hey at least the transes will be mad innit.
It is not a pointless difference. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists have been banned in the UK for the treatment of gender dysphoria. They are of course still available for treating precocious puberty, regardless of how anyone identifies.