1404
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] venoft@lemmy.world 71 points 5 months ago

She's wrong though, everything following the scientific method is science. The fact that you didn't pay out of your ass to publicize your research doesn't matter. Of course it reaches less people, but that's a separate issue.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Does it require independent peer review though? How do you achieve that ~~with~~ without publication? The predatory publication system is a different point.

Edit: fix without

[-] Mojave@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Wouldn't this imply that science didn't exist before academic publication existed? Was zero science conducted before the ~1600s then?

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Was zero science conducted before the ~1600s then?

I mean, yes. The framework of studying things that we understand as science did not always exist.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Every time someone thinks science and studying natural phenomena are the same thing Newton sheds a single tear from his non-poked eye.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
1404 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

10819 readers
2852 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS