39
Are you a 'tankie'
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
39 points (62.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43958 readers
1205 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Why does there need to be a balance of left and right to be healthy? Why do you believe this balance has been lost, if it's healthier to have it?
I'm looking towards the violent shifting of power and ideology after the French Revolution. Its people coming to power through struggle, wreaking revenge on the other side of the Isle and then the balance of power shifting again, with the same violent results.
Unchecked power isn't pretty. There need to be balance. However the discourse is creeping to the right almost everywhere and that fudges a lot up.
Revolution is a response to current society failing. Revolution doesn't happen because random people do it spontaneously, but is a result of declining material conditions.
Unchecked power may not be pretty, but I fail to see what that has to do with left vs right. It seems to me that retaining Capitalist hedgemony for the sake of "balance" is just idealism.
Well in a well balanced system the industry and high captial woudn't have the most influence on politics. Redistribution of wealth can be archieved without bloodshed.
In my opinion that is, I don't think capitalist he ~~d~~ gemony is evil per se, only if it's allowed to run rampant, which it does without proper checks and blances.
Having Capitalism at all means you have outsized influence on the state from Capitalists.
Capitalist hedgemony is evil because it necessarily grows and decays like a cancer, resulting in Imperialism, hyper-exploitation, and power consolidation in fewer and fewer hands. You cannot check it.
I didn't think we would see eye to eye, but I wish to do so amically.
Thanks for the discussion!
(btw it's hegemony, without the d. No hedgefunds in there)