106
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
106 points (94.2% liked)
politics
19132 readers
4111 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sounds about right, considering ACAB.
What a disgusting person he is.
All law and order, so long as it's the peasants. Not his God-daddy Trump though
Yes, and I watched the interview. He's very much mocking the Democrats in charge of California for being "soft on crime":
“And so they let them out, they give them food, they give them housing, they give them money, they give them drugs and alcohol now, and I gotta be honest, I’m getting tired,” Bianco said.
In a tongue-in-cheek delivery, Bianco implied he was done fighting against the tide and trying to enforce the laws and thus, “switching teams” and instead endorsing a convicted criminal in Trump.
“I think it’s time that instead of letting them out of jail and and giving them alcohol and drugs and everything else, I think it’s time we put a felon in the White House,” Bianco said.
My absolute bad. The article implies the opposite of what he did.
All good homie, no ill will
Right, the entire thing was sarcasm. But his point was "hey we're letting off these petty criminals in my state, so I'm just gonna say it's completely fine to put a felon in the White House"
His whole point was to mock the Democratic leadership of his state, trying to equate their criminal justice reform to Trump's conviction. As if they are even remotely related
I had to go find another article to understand what was going on. Sorry.
The idea that calling trump a felon is somehow sarcasm doesn't compute. He is. I don't sarcastically call the sky blue.
Yeah no worries at all man, it was a weird press conference lol. I think once you see how he's ripping criminal justice reform it becomes a bit clearer
"All these Dems are letting people out of jail for shoplifting! Well, might as well put a felon in the Oval!"
It's just disingenuous bullshit from the Right, nothing new
Like... I would totally go to Trump loving folks and be like, "you got me. I'm on team Trump now. Before he was a felon, I couldn't stand him, but now he has experienced the abuses of the criminal justice system that is a daily fact of life for so many, particularly black people, and I think we should have a president who understands their plight."
Now, that would be deadpan sarcasm, but I'd say that. Which is what I really thought the article was saying. I read it multiple times trying to understand what was going on.
Haha yeah I live in a city that’s majority black and some of my friends at the local dive bar are actually saying stuff like that. I just keep my mouth shut because I know they’re in the minority with that opinion but it still blows my mind