I think "civil war" is less likely than just mass rioting of the type we've seen many times before. A civil war needs to have some level of real political antagonism. Red v Blue doesn't have that. It's more like gang warfare.
You’re right, rioting is probably the better term to use since I would think “civil war” would require a lot more organizing… either way the situation in the States and up here are not looking good.
I think "civil war" is less likely than just mass rioting of the type we've seen many times before. A civil war needs to have some level of real political antagonism. Red v Blue doesn't have that. It's more like gang warfare.
You’re right, rioting is probably the better term to use since I would think “civil war” would require a lot more organizing… either way the situation in the States and up here are not looking good.