179
submitted 5 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago
[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

It's how they should work.

When I get an ad in the mail, the advertiser doesn't know that I actually looked at it. When I grab a newspaper ad at the store, the advertiser doesn't know that I did that unless I use a coupon or something.

That's how I'd like online ads to work, but with a bit of targeting based on local-only data.

If they want me to look at ads, they're going to need to respect my privacy. If not, I'm content leaving my ad-blocker enabled.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago

The whole point of targeted advertising is that you get to bid on people you want. You want a old fat guy in Oklahoma? Done You want to advertise gambling apps to people who have a history of gambling? Done.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

That's certainly true from Google's or Meta's perspective, but it wasn't always that way.

I get ads in my mailbox that are completely irrelevant to me, like Medicare ads (probably for the previous owner). As a kid, I watched lots of ads on TV that definitely weren't applicable to me (e.g. cutco knives, when I wasn't old enough to use a knife). I see billboards on my way to work for debt relief (not in any debt, aside from mortgage) and addiction recovery (no addictions here). Companies pay quite a bit for those ads even if they won't be relevant for most people because of the sheer reach of those ads.

I'm proposing a middleground. Ad companies don't get as accurate of targeting for ads, but in exchange they get seen by people who would otherwise block them.

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
179 points (98.4% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers
17 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS