484
submitted 6 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Only the best current reason. When frump is out of the picture for good we can focus on other things

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Also it is no reflection at all on Biden that he happens to be running against the person whom historians have ranked as the worst president in American history. Biden is ranks as 14th best president out of 46.

https://www.axios.com/2024/02/19/presidents-survey-trump-ranks-last-biden-14th

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

James Buchanan fans everywhere are overjoyed

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I wish I believed that. There will always be some new threat. There will always be some dire threat keeping us voting for second worst instead of ever expecting better.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Biden is not 2nd worst. Out of the 4-5 candidates running Biden is by far the best.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago

His pro-genocide cult is fond of saying that there are only two choices when they're browbeating anyone who is upset with him for any reason.

But no. He's still second worst. And his recent adoption of Trump's immigration policies has narrowed the gap.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You support a regressive Libertarian candidate over the most progressive candidate since FDR. And a Kremlin stooge. And a nutbag billionaire. Got it.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

the most progressive candidate since FDR

by what standard?!

dude literally voted against gay marriage; gays in the military; permanent student loans; advocated against gays in federal service; racial integration; sexual harassment claims; blocked access to non-american social media platform; and blocked americans from affordable electric vehicles.

was it the one law that passed decades after it was no longer an issue and, not only did nothing, but gave bigots legal protection for their bigotry?

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

dude literally voted against

Presidents do not vote on anything. I said he was the most progressive PRESIDENT since LBJ/FDR.

by what standard?!

Raising taxes on corporations. Wealth inequality is the number 1 problem in the country. Reducing wealth inequality is the biggest thing FDR did. But also: Reducing costs of ACA and Medicare. Increasing access to health care. Lowering prices on drugs thru direct government regulation. Reducing student loans. Action on climate change. Reducing taxes on lower/middle class. That is just some of the obvious stuff.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

I do not. I'm voting for Biden. But as Biden's pro-genocide cult is so delighted to gloat, a vote for any other option is a vote for Trump. Since all other candidates are functionally Trump, Biden is second worst. And he's moving to the right on immigration to be more like Trump.

But hey, go ahead and make assumptions based on things you prefer to think instead of what I've actually written.

the most progressive candidate since FDR

This is horseshit. No one buys it.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

You think it will be any better then?

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Cant say. Nobody can read the future for good or bad. I just prefer to be optimistic rather than not. All i can say is that the current choices are all there is and, as always, the lesser of two evils is what we have to work with

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
484 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19240 readers
1208 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS