144
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kippinitreal@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

In your guys opinion, is that good or bad? Privately funded would mean proprietary & profit driven implementation for such a crucial technology (if successful). I personally don't like it.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 years ago

The CPC still maintains a lot of influence over companies even when they're getting their funding from private industry as part of their "politics in command" strategy for controlling market forces. We'll see how it plays out.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yep, if they need to disappear a CEO, no matter how big, they can and have done so in the past.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 years ago

Won't somebody think of the CEOs!

[-] match@pawb.social 19 points 2 years ago

i don't know why you got a downvote, disappearinga CEO should be the most popular thing the ccp does

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Not to an Amerikan cosplay-capitalist lmfao. (I call them cosplay-capitalists because not a one actually owns capital; they just lap at the scraps that fall on the low-quarters of the c-suites they worship.)

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago

The billionaires deserve it tbh

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

Any path that takes us to unlimited clean energy is the right one IMO. We could always do a little espionage and make our own domestic fusion drive eventually.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago

I don’t mind profit driven because I’m confident that free markets are good for everybody.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
144 points (84.3% liked)

World News

38630 readers
506 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS