343
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago

Automatic registration for Selective Services, not automatic draft. That’s very different. This is actually helpful in keeping people out of prison or getting fined for not registering.

But yes, this absolutely proves that they could automatically register people to vote with no designated party affiliation.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 years ago

As a European I have always been confused when Americans talk about "voter registration". The way it works in my country is you are legally required to register your residence with the government and that registration is automatically used to determine a voter registry (just filtering by age, citizenship and exclusion due to criminal convictions all of which is information already known to the government). I always just get a letter a few weeks before elections informing me where my polling place is.

Well you see, in the United States, the way some politicians, specifically ones belonging to a certain very authoritarian political party manage to get elected is by making sure people don't or can't vote.

This is often coupled with throwing a huge hissy fit about "voter fraud" which doesn't actually exist on any remotely meaningful level.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Btw it's insane to exclude people in a supposed democracy based on criminal convictions.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 12 points 2 years ago

It's by design, if everyone voted, there would only be a very limited few republikkklowns in office, if any.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

It seems that they exclude people wherever the commenter lives too.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Can exclude, not all of them do, I think it has to be a specific part of the sentence (ie not automatic) because some high court ruled that some years ago.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Can exclude, not all of them do Who are "them"?

Who is excluding people where you live and why can they do that? Isn't it handled centrally by a single governmental body?

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

I meant not all criminal offenses necessarily cause an exclusion from voting rights. If I recall correctly there is a list of specific ones for which people can be sentenced to loss of voting rights.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

That sounds logical for offences that have something to do with trying to overthrow the government or the like

[-] Enkrod@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

German Law is very sane in regards to voting rights.

§ 13 of the German Federal Election Act (BWG) stipulates that only who is disenfranchised as a result of a judge's decision is excluded from the right to vote.

This provision does not conflict with the general principle of equality in Article 3 of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz - GG) and the principles of equality and universality of the vote, because the right to vote is not automatically revoked, but may only be revoked by a judge's ruling if certain legal requirements are met.

However, this exclusion as a result of a German court ruling is only possible in a few cases expressly mentioned in the Criminal Code (StGB) and the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) and applies for a maximum of two to five years. Exclusion from the right to vote applies if a person has been sentenced to at least six months or at least one year in prison for the following offenses, for example:

  • Preparation of a war of aggression and high treason against the Federation
  • Treason and disclosure of state secrets
  • Attack against organs and representatives of foreign states
  • Obstruction of elections and falsification of election documents
  • Bribery of members of parliament
  • acts of sabotage of means of defense or intelligence service endangering security (in this case, a prison sentence of at least one year is required).

In these cases, the deprivation of the right to vote is at the discretion of the court in accordance with the special criminal law provisions and is not an automatic consequence of the conviction for these criminal offenses.

Furthermore, the right to vote can be revoked by the Federal Constitutional Court due to the violation of fundamental rights.

The disenfranchisement from voting is btw. also the foundation that makes one ineligible to be elected.

According to the Federal Election Act, anyone who has German citizenship and is of legal age on the day of the election is electable. This does not apply to those who:

  • have lost the right to vote and therefore their eligibility to be elected as a result of a court ruling or no longer have the capacity to hold public office
  • is permanently dependent on a statutory caregiver / guardian
  • or is in a psychiatric hospital due to a conviction
[-] redisdead@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

In France you have to register to vote as well. It takes about a minute and you can do it online or at the town hall

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Yep. Same. You just go get stamp in passport once, then you just go to voting station with passport. That's it. Oh, also by default(when you get passport) you get stamp that you live where you lived during filing.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

you are legally required to register your residence with the government

Bit depressing.

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Even in the US, you're legally required to for quite a number of things. The most obvious being driver's license/ID cards.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The standard is good behavior, not other people.

Also ID cards don't require it. License's do.

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

In my state, the state-issued photo ID cards absolutely do.

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
343 points (97.5% liked)

News

36529 readers
375 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS