336
submitted 2 years ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 122 points 2 years ago

Maybe once they tackle this they can figure out a way to just send me a fucking bill every year instead of forcing me to do their work to then send them money.

[-] isu712@lemmy.world 108 points 2 years ago

They’ve actually been trying to do this for years. There were actually a couple years of tests out in California I think. However, there are two big lobbies that always put a halt to it, tax preparation services (H&R Block, Intuit, etc.) and groups that want taxes to be a pain in the ass so we’ll all bitch about them.

Check out this episode of Planet Money if you want to learn more:

Planet Money - Tax Hero

[-] LeadSoldier@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

TLDR: Our government is for sale and two corporations apparently give instructions to the entire IRS and tax system because they pay a "subscription fee" to our politicians.

All as designed by the supreme court.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Pro tip: use Taxslayer

I love them. Much better than Turbohax

[-] ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I've been using the Cash App one and it's totally free. It was formerly Credit Karma's before TurboTax bought them and they were forced to divest the free tax program. I usually will run the same numbers through TurboTax and the results end up being the same.

[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Anything but the big guys

[-] optissima@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Protip: just fill out the paperwork! It walks you through it and takes no more time than making a pathfinder character. Tbh the whole act of doing it reminds me of making a ttrpg character: you get a template sheet and a booklet that walks you through it.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

if the free ones would automatically populate for free I would totally use them just to not do the data input. But since they are all bs and don't actually do it for free I do the free fillable forms. Real pro tip is use a spreadsheet to add things up for wierd forms that don't do stuff for you. I put my 1099's in a spreadsheet and copied and pasted from it and it just made the whole thing easier to look over and verify. will do the same anytime I have multiples of the same form and then also for things like ira nonfillable pdf.

[-] FatAdama@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

So you’re the kind of person who enjoys filling out the paper registration for a product warranty, I suspect.

[-] optissima@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Nope, but I do enjoy a good character sheet.

[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

nah no ty, ill have them auto-input for me with an upload. Im already doing their job theyd have to do in modern countries

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

The stakes are a bit higher compared to D&D.

I should be able to just stuff what I think is the right amount of gold coins in an envelope and label it "to IRS" and they can figure out if I need another coin or two.

[-] optissima@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, but all you have to do is follow the guide? It literally took 15 min to do my taxes this year.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

And then I get one thing wrong and get a bill years later that I can't fight with interest payments or they cut out the middleman and just email my employer and demand they take it out of my pay.

[-] optissima@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Damn the TurboTax propaganda goes strong here.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That wasn't my point at all. I want the IRS to do my taxes for me.

[-] optissima@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Well the first step is removing Big Tax Collectors from the equation, which was my goal with the original post.

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

They already know how, it's been blocked as far as i'm aware by Tax return companies.

[-] Dark_Arc@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I think they already do in a sense; that's the standard deduction. If you want to maximize your returns you might be better off itemizing though, and that option is what makes everything complicated (I suspect they'd have a hard time sending you a bill for everything you itemize... I don't know that they really know everything you could itemize; I think that really only comes up when it's suspicious/you get audited).

i.e., if they did that, you'd basically get fewer options, and maybe less money back(?)

[-] ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

87% of people take the standard deduction. Just give people a bill (or I dunno, take out the correct amount to begin with) and allow people to contest or do an itemized deduction if they disagree.

[-] AEsheron@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Several countries have already figured this out, ot isn't rocket surgery. The government has a pretty good idea what you owe, and send you a bill. If you want to take another route, you're free to submit your own taxes, but the vast majority don't need to do anything like that. There's no reason we couldn't use the same system, if it assumes standard deduction that would cover the vast majority of people. Anyone who wants to itemize would be free to, it just wouldn't be automatic, so essentially, nothing would change for them. Well, almost nothing, the difference is if they take too long they have a safety net standard deduction already filed and done I guess.

[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Even when you take the standard deduction, only had one job in one state for the tax year, and have no investments or other income (ie. the only way your taxes could be simpler is if you don't have any income and someone else pays all your bills), it's still complicated to file taxes manually. Many other developed countries will automatically calculate the most common scenarios for most taxpayers, and only people with unusual situations have to do any manual calculations (or pay a tax preparer).

[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't think sending you a bill would work for most people, since they don't know how much you owe until you tell them whether you're married, have dependent kids, have a mortgage, etc. These are things they need to verify every year, so you will always need to send them something every year.

That said, they could certainly make the process simpler.

[-] ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

The government already knows all that information about you. You give your family information to your employer which passes it on to the government. Your mortgage company (and any other financial institution for that matter) sends the government information about your loans/accounts. That's how they know you filled out your taxes correctly to begin with.

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You give your family information to your employer so they can estimate your taxes. But you're not required to keep them up to date.

So for instance if you tell your employer that you're single and then get married, you are not required to update your employer. Same is true of having a child, etc. Hence the need for an official annual update, which goes directly to the IRS.

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
336 points (99.1% liked)

News

37872 readers
571 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS