178
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wagoner@infosec.pub 23 points 1 year ago

Realistically, what can you use this for that's worthwhile?

Cool looking device though.

[-] veeesix@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago

You could relive booting up your computer at breakfast to get it ready to use by lunchtime.

[-] 555@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

If it doesn’t have that hard drive crunch to remind me it hasn’t locked up than I’m not interested.

[-] Fillicia@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

See for me it's the "you can now shut down your pc" message so I know I can shut down the uselessly huge toggle on the front of my tower.

[-] 555@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I always liked knowing I could kill it with a press. None of this “asking” to shutdown.

[-] Toes@ani.social 14 points 1 year ago

You could play Wolfenstein?

But realistically, I could see this being helpful if you maintain a lot of legacy gear and need to drag around something reliable to test with.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] shadearg@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

40MHz is plenty for doom.

Ew, no. Even 386DX-40 is terrible for Doom:

Doom timedemo 386 DX 40 MHz DOS PC

486SX-33 is certainly playable, but you really want 486DX2/66:

Doom Timedemo - 486DX2/66MHz

Edit: grammar

Edit 2: These videos are accurate, btw. I upgraded from 386SX-25 to 486SX-33 just for Doom while my friend got the 486DX2/66 Packard Bell. Envy.

Edit 3: My memory forced me to go back and properly designate the models.

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

Can confirm. My dad had a 386DX-40 when I got my hands on a copy of Doom, and it was a fucking slideshow at best.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had a 386sx@25MHz too and I don't remember it being that slow. Unless that demo has the detail cranked up to high or something like that. Although, like that first commenter I had a math co-processor, so maybe that helped.

Or maybe my memory is off and I made the window tiny.

[-] shadearg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Are you sure you didn't set low-detail with the viewport cranked way down? I played it on the same model ~~with a math co-processor~~ and it could not handle high-detail and the large viewport in the video.

Edit: I'm fairly certain I had a math co-processor, but I'll defer to you on this detail just in case. That would certainly make a sizeable difference.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think the detail level made a pretty big difference. I definitely ran it in low and kind of forgot that high was an option, but the shotgun animation in that video is bringing up some traumatic memories.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] 555@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You’d get better performance from an emulator running in a raspberry pi inside that case.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So we buy it for the case! Retro computing raspberry pi case!!!

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Sleeper laptop.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
178 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

73067 readers
817 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS