107
Mastodon rolls out built-in bylines for journalists in the fediverse
(www.theverge.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
107 points (99.1% liked)
Fediverse
17670 readers
14 users here now
A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.
Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".
Getting started on Fediverse;
- What is the fediverse?
- Fediverse Platforms
- How to run your own community
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
It works in a pretty neat way:
via: https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2024/07/highlighting-journalism-on-mastodon/
A neat way would be to re-use one the 200 already existing standards like
rel="author"or evenrel="me"(which mastodon already supports anyway). This solution just is just NIH-driven development.I think the difference lies in two things:
You can share an article from a user of a different instance. In this case, your instance will have to look up the rel="author" tag and check whether the URL is a fediverse instance. I'm not sure whether this is scalable as compared to a tag that directly indicates that the author is on the fediverse. Imagining a scenario where there are 100, 1000, 10,000, or 100,000 instances on different versions.
The tag is to promote that the author is on the fediverse. If the rel="author" tag points to twitter for example, maybe Eugen Rochko + team didn't want a post on the fediverse to link to twitter.
These are my thoughts and idk if they're valid. But I think just reusing the rel="author" isn't the most elegant solution.
I know that mastodon already uses rel="me" for link verification (I use it on mu website + my mastodon account), but that's a different purpose - that's more for verification. There's still no way of guaranteeing that the rel="author" tag points to a fediverse account. You're putting the onus on the mastodon instance.
There's also no guarantee that the rel=me points to a fediverse instance, mastodon already has logic to deal with thus without reinventing the wheel with what's effectively a proprietary solution.