153
submitted 4 months ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 18 points 4 months ago

Well, they have been under US sanctions for a long time now. That's what started the Pacific side of WWII.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

Mmm… sort of, but that telling of the situation also skips over a ton of context.

US sanctions against Imperial Japan were the proximate casus belli for the IJN attack Pearl Harbor and causing the US to actually join the war, but the sanctions were absolutely precipitated by other things Japan was doing in the years leading up to Pearl Harbor. The trade sanctions were enacted in more or less direct response to Imperial Japanese military adventurism and rather flagrant violations of the Washington Naval Treaty (though it is definitely fair to say that the force limitations imposed by the treaty were somewhat onerous and biased towards established powers, if considered in a geopolitical vacuum).

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The effects of the Communist revolution and the US response to it were so powerful that they went back in time by 20 years to start WW2?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I've read this like five times and I have no idea what the heck you're trying to get at.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

The person said Cuba being under US sanctions is what caused the Pacific side of WWII. What they were TRYING to say is that Cuba has been under sanctions, and that OTHER, unrelated sanctions were the cause of the Pacific side of WWII; but they used indefinite pronouns and therefor had a confusing sentence.

The joke is about the unintended interpretation of the sentence.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

Ah. So the joke is he's bad at reading.

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

Maynarkh said that Cuba has been under US sanctions, and also that US sanctions started the Japan-US conflict during WWII. Gravitas has misinterpreted it, intentionally or not, for it to mean that US sanctions on Cuba started the Japan-US war.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

The user he responded to said the sanctions affected WW2 when the sanction happened much later.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Sanctions on Japan. That was extremely obvious in context. I thought they had a point beyond being unable to read.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

back in time by 20 years to start WW2

Boy here is posting from all the way back in 1959….

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
153 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39144 readers
1368 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS